Re: apreq_parse_generic example

2013-11-08 Thread Joseph Schaefer
Been a while since I thought about this, but apreq is really only suited for table-based data structures. JSON is a little too generic for that unless you know the data is restricted to only key-value pairs. On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Brian J. France br...@brianfrance.com wrote: Does anybody

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxying and AH01179: balancer slotmem_create failed

2013-11-08 Thread Thomas Eckert
Thanks for the patch, so far it's looking good. I'll get back to you once I have more information. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: try this: On Nov 6, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Thomas Eckert thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote: It is not mentioned

mod_proxy: maximum hostname length for workers

2013-11-08 Thread Thomas Eckert
I'm looking at an issue with this log message AH00526: Syntax error on line 6 of myconfig.conf: BalancerMember worker hostname (---dd-eee-ff.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com) too long with the root cause being (modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h) #define

Re: mod_proxy: maximum hostname length for workers

2013-11-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yeah, it's basically for performance and storage reasons (since those strings are stored in shm)... Nowadays I don't think shm is such an expensive commodity, though I can imagine some setups where the default sizes allowed by the kernel could be kinda small. I'd be +1 in adjusting all of those

Re: mod_proxy: maximum hostname length for workers

2013-11-08 Thread Thomas Eckert
I'd be +1 in adjusting all of those fields bigger, but I'm guessing that constitutes an API change for proxy... API change, why is that ? At least the shm size stuff doesn't look like having a lot of implications other then memory consumption - to make sure of this assumption is why I asked in

Timetable for 2.2.26 release?

2013-11-08 Thread Ben Reser
Does anyone have a timetable for a 2.2.26 release? Subversion users have been running into the issues introduced in 2.2.25 and we've been pointing them at patches. Some but not all of the binaries floating around have been patched. It would be really nice to be able to have a httpd release to

apreq_parse_generic example

2013-11-08 Thread Brian J. France
Does anybody have example code of how to use apreq_parse_generic in an httpd module hook (non-handler)? Need to use apreq2 and mod_apreq2 to read json data and not having any luck. Thanks, Brian

apreq_parse_generic example

2013-11-08 Thread Brian J. France
Does anybody have example code of how to use apreq_parse_generic in an httpd module hook (non-handler)? Need to use apreq2 and mod_apreq2 to read json data and not having any luck. Thanks, Brian - Please keep me looped into any reply, not subscribed.

Re: Timetable for 2.2.26 release?

2013-11-08 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
I am happy to TR in the coming days. The approved mod_ssl EC patch has me a bit concerned that it is so out of sync with what has been proposed for back port to 2.4 - I spent some time reviewing that 2.4 patch as well and think it would be easier if the 2.4 patch were split into two proposals...

Re: Timetable for 2.2.26 release?

2013-11-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'll RM 2.2.26... how does a TR late next week sound? On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: Does anyone have a timetable for a 2.2.26 release? Subversion users have been running into the issues introduced in 2.2.25 and we've been pointing them at patches. Some but

Re: mod_proxy: maximum hostname length for workers

2013-11-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Mostly due to the persist feature... Right now it just does a memcpy (basically). If people don't use it then it's not an issue. On Nov 8, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Thomas Eckert thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote: I'd be +1 in adjusting all of those fields bigger, but I'm guessing that constitutes

persisting the slotmem (Was: Re: mod_proxy: maximum hostname length for workers)

2013-11-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
This has me thinking... we should likely do something to better error-check the store/restore aspects of slotmem. Even some sort of quick checksum would be better than what we have now. :/ Gotta mull this over a bit more. On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Mostly

Re: apreq_parse_generic example

2013-11-08 Thread Brian J. France
Right, which is why I thought the apreq_parse_generic would handle that and I can pull the full string out and handle it myself. What I really need is a way for a hook to read the post data and the content handler to also be able to read it as well. mod_apreq allowed this for types it knows