On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> It would be quite valuable if there is a limit on how much can be pre-read
> (0 for pure streaming). Pre-reading the request body reduces the number of
> application processes or threads required, and they are usually fatter
> (sometimes dram
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
> > Anyway, I'm diving into the code a bit - but, I figured it might be
> useful
> > to see if anyone else has any thoughts about how to handle large request
> > bodies with mod
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> Anyway, I'm diving into the code a bit - but, I figured it might be useful
> to see if anyone else has any thoughts about how to handle large request
> bodies with mod_fcgid.
Here's a first-cut patch that compiles at least. Cheers. --
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length on HEAD
> requests - IOW, they don't in
Am 27.12.2013 16:53, schrieb Frederick Miller:
> Please remove me from this email list. Please unsubscribe me. Thanks.
first do *not* hijack threads
please realize that any mailing list has a welcome message
which should be read after subscribe and not careless thrown
away as well as list header
Please stop sending me these emails.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length
How can I unsubscribe from these emails?
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Len
On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length on HEAD requests
> - IOW, they don't infer the lack of a Content-Length as being '0'. If we
> weren't
Please remove me from this email list. Please unsubscribe me. Thanks.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 06:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> > You're ahead of us. Individual Apache folks like Jim have taken
> > responsibility and moved to 4096-bit keys, but w
On 12/26/2013 06:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> You're ahead of us. Individual Apache folks like Jim have taken
> responsibility and moved to 4096-bit keys, but we haven't as a
> community had the discussion that might lead to pruning KEYS.
> My inclination is to say NO to requiring anyone to remove old
Hi all!
There are two patches that the Ceph community has applied to their httpd
packages in combination with radosgw (S3 endpoint) - (see
https://github.com/ceph/apache2).
One of them is to allow Content-Length of '0' to be emitted from HEAD
requests:
https://github.com/ceph/apache2/commit/0d99
Hi all!
I'm currently using FastCGI for an application - in particular, Ceph's
radosgw (S3 endpoint). I was told to use mod_fastcgi as mod_fcgid doesn't
handle large request bodies appropriately. Yet, when I looked at the
mod_fastcgi code, I shrieked in horror. =)
In looking at add_request_bod
12 matches
Mail list logo
