Looks like we are Good2Go for a TR today at noonish (eastern)
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
It is nice and could be reused by ProxyBlock.
---
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c | 98 +--
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c b/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
We resolve the names using the configuration parsing, thus we already have the
addresses. It could be redundant for NoProxy, but the same code could be used
with ProxyBlock if it did this.
---
modules/proxy/proxy_util.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
Currently they are used for NoProxy, but could be reusable to ProxyBlock.
Rename them to something more generic.
---
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c | 8
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h | 4 ++--
modules/proxy/proxy_util.c | 24
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
They do the same task now, so we can remove some duplicate code. They do the
same thing except that ProxyBlock does certain things better -- they support
masked network addresses, thus we can now block subnets.
---
docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml | 14
Hi,
I opened a ticket [1] with the patches (chained to this message), but got
virtually
no responsem, therefore I assume it might be a better idea to discuss them in a
list.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56152
I'd very thankful for a review and evenutal merge.
Thank
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
---
docs/manual/mod/mod_authnz_ldap.xml | 28 +++
docs/manual/style/scripts/prettify.js | 2 +-
include/util_ldap.h | 4 ++-
modules/aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c | 16 +++--
modules/ldap/util_ldap.c
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
---
docs/manual/mod/mod_authnz_ldap.xml | 34 -
docs/manual/style/scripts/prettify.js | 2 +-
include/util_ldap.h | 5 +-
modules/aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c | 14 +-
modules/ldap/util_ldap.c | 94
Hi,
I've submitted a patch set [1] adding SASL support to mod_authn_ldap a while
ago, but the ticket got no feedback. I'd be very thankful for a review and
merge.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55178
Thank you!
Lubo
---
Hi,
please review and merge this. It seems to be an easyfix, but the ticket [1]
seemengly generated no useful attention.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
Thank you,
Lubo
glue/perl/lib/Apache2/Cookie.pm | 14 --
1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:42:46 -0600
William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
With no objection, I will tag and roll 2.2 branch for release a week
from Friday, with the intent to announce both the proper 2.4 'current'
and the 2.2 'legacy' at the same time in tandem with Jim's efforts.
To
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On 11/03/2014 20:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
On 11.03.2014 21:41, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 11/03/2014 20:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these
Probably 2.4.8/STATUS should be fixed too.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:10 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ylavic
Date: Tue Mar 11 21:10:01 2014
New Revision: 1576504
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1576504
Log:
Fix 2.4.8 release year.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Builds fine on VC11 Win32, other flavors I try tomorrow
Till now it runs fine, but get the following (run OpenSSL 1.0.1f):
AH02559: The SSLCertificateChainFile directive
(D:/servers/apacheS/conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf:55) is deprecated,
SSLCertificateFile should be used instead
In the
On 3/11/2014 1:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to
On 11 Mar 2014, at 22:43, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Builds fine on VC11 Win32, other flavors I try tomorrow
Till now it runs fine, but get the following (run OpenSSL 1.0.1f):
AH02559: The SSLCertificateChainFile directive
(D:/servers/apacheS/conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf:55)
On 11.03.2014 21:53, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 21:41, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 11/03/2014 20:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Am 11.03.2014 22:52, schrieb Falco Schwarz:
On 11 Mar 2014, at 22:43, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com
mailto:i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Builds fine on VC11 Win32, other flavors I try tomorrow
Till now it runs fine, but get the following (run OpenSSL 1.0.1f):
AH02559: The
SLCertificateFile points already the certificate:
SSLCertificateFile conf/ssl.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile conf/ssl.key
The doc says the directive can be used multiple times.
So I added : SSLCertificateFile conf/sub.class2.server.ca.cer
But then Apache does not start:
[Tue Mar 11
Am 27.02.2014 18:19, schrieb ryo takatsuki:
Thx for the patch! Let me take a look... I'm assuming that there's
no real work-around other than the patch itself, right?
If there is, we could not find it :) We have been searching for months
and trying different approaches. This is required to work
On 12/03/2014 00:30, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
The fix was applied on Feb 11 2013. That would mean that official releases
affected would be 0.9.8y, 1.0.0j and 1.0.1c. Any later official release should
include the fix but we weren't planning to make any more 0.9.8 official
releases
though a
On 11/03/2014 21:46, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 3/11/2014 1:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as
On 12/03/2014 09:17, Noel Butler wrote:
On 12/03/2014 02:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1:
On 12/03/2014 02:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
27 matches
Mail list logo