On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
I'm confused. Piped logging did work just fine on Windows, unless
something has broken it.
Yes, it normally works fine, but creates two piped loggers for each access
log . One piped logger child of the parent,
It seems like recent httpd announcements are only going to
annou...@apache.org, but I could not find any discussion about it.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Thoughts? Is it reasonable to do something in mod_cgi{d} to improve
the situation?
I don't think so, even if we tried to figure out the interpreter, it could
run _anything_ else that is interpreted by bash.
But an
Am 24.09.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org
mailto:p...@querna.org wrote:
Thoughts? Is it reasonable to do something in mod_cgi{d} to improve
the situation?
I don't think so, even if we tried to figure out the
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:15 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org
mailto:p...@querna.org wrote:
Thoughts? Is it reasonable to do something in mod_cgi{d} to improve
the situation?
I don't think so,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
HTTPD:
From the httpd point of view, what does serf
provide for us to help us get to http/2.0?
How about a new mod_proxy_http2 which can go async like in
mod_proxy_wstunnel (trunk)?
Some code could then be moved to
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
HTTPD:
From the httpd point of view, what does serf
provide for us to help us get to http/2.0?
How about a new mod_proxy_http2 which can go async
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:21 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:15 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org
mailto:p...@querna.org wrote:
Thoughts? Is it reasonable to do something in mod_cgi{d} to
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
A workaround like
--- server/util_script.c.orig 2013-09-14 14:12:54.0 +
+++ server/util_script.c2014-09-24 20:35:54.952054361 +
@@ -128,6 +128,12 @@
}
++whack;
Am 24.09.2014 um 23:29 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
A workaround like
--- server/util_script.c.orig 2013-09-14 14:12:54.0 +
+++ server/util_script.c2014-09-24 20:35:54.952054361 +
@@ -128,6 +128,12
Am 24.09.2014 um 23:15 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:21 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:15 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org
mailto:p...@querna.org wrote:
Thoughts? Is it
On 23 Sep 2014, at 9:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
APR:
Considering that before we know it, http/2.0 will
be here, and ignoring httpd for the time being,
what features/additions do we see as being needed
to support http/2.0 from an APR library level? How do
we compare w/
12 matches
Mail list logo
