Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk

2014-11-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
Rebasing discussion here since this thread seems to be referenced in PR55897, and the discussion has somehow been forked and continued in [1]. [1]. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201410.mbox/%3c9acd5b67aac5594cb6268234cf29cf9aa37e9...@orsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com%3E On Sat,

Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk

2014-11-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi Yingqi, let's continue discussing this on the original thread if you don't mind, I made an update there. Thanks, Yann. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Lu, Yingqi yingqi...@intel.com wrote: Hi Yann, I just took some testing on the most recent trunk version. I found out that num_buckets

Re: [Patch] mod_ssl SSL_CLIENT_CERT_SUBJECTS - access to full client certificate chain

2014-11-06 Thread Andreas B.
Am 06.11.2014 um 08:34 schrieb Dirk-Willem van Gulik: On 06 Nov 2014, at 07:05, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote: 11.3.1 Certificate exact match … CertificateExactAssertion ::= SEQUENCE { serialNumber CertificateSerialNumber, issuerName } ... (i.e., we are

Re: PR still opened but stated as fixed in CHANGES (2.4 branch)

2014-11-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Christophe JAILLET christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Hi, if someone is interested, here is a list of all PR still marked as NEW in bugzilla but that are stated as fixed in CHANGES in the 2.4 branch. I had started to have a look at them in order to close

Re: [Patch] mod_ssl SSL_CLIENT_CERT_SUBJECTS - access to full client certificate chain

2014-11-06 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On 06 Nov 2014, at 14:14, Andreas B. regis...@progandy.de wrote: Am 06.11.2014 um 08:34 schrieb Dirk-Willem van Gulik: On 06 Nov 2014, at 07:05, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch mailto:httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote: 11.3.1 Certificate exact match … CertificateExactAssertion ::=

Re: APR_INT32_MAX used by mod_delate-2.2.29

2014-11-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: mod_deflate in httpd-2.2.29 is using APR_INT32_MAX which is only available since APR-1.3. However httpd-2.x seems to require APR-1.2 only (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/install.html#requirements). Should we apply

Re: APR_INT32_MAX used by mod_delate-2.2.29

2014-11-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: mod_deflate in httpd-2.2.29 is using APR_INT32_MAX which is only available since APR-1.3. However httpd-2.x seems to require APR-1.2 only

Re: Building APR using cmake on Windows

2014-11-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Edward Lu chaos...@gmail.com wrote: Using Visual Studio 2013 command line tools, on Windows Server 2012 rc2. Running everything from batch files through Cygwin. I cloned the APR repo from here: https://github.com/apache/apr I downloaded some prebuilt libxml2

Re: Building APR using cmake on Windows

2014-11-06 Thread Edward Lu
Thanks Jeff. Will move further discussion to the bug/proper mailing list. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Edward Lu chaos...@gmail.com wrote: Using Visual Studio 2013 command line tools, on Windows Server 2012 rc2.

Re: Server(_rec) unique identifier

2014-11-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote: On 29.10.2014 11:41, Yann Ylavic wrote: I chose to use (MD5 digest) all the IP:port from the s-addrs list (ie. VitualHost IP|*|_default_:port ...), plus s-server_hostname and s-port (ie. ServerName, be it configured

RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk

2014-11-06 Thread Lu, Yingqi
Hi Yann, I don't mind at all. I will keep discussion following your reply there. Thanks, Yingqi -Original Message- From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 5:00 AM To: httpd Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT

RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk

2014-11-06 Thread Lu, Yingqi
Hi Yann, I do not see any documents regarding to this new configurable flag ListenCoresBucketsRatio (maybe I missed it) and also users may not be familiar with it, I still think maybe it is better to keep the default to 8 at least in the trunk. Regarding to how to make small systems take