+1
Regards
Rüdiger
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2014 22:28
To: httpd
Subject: Re: server/util_expr_(parse|scan) generated sources files
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Maybe we
Hi,
I've found out that following configuration does not work as expected:
Proxy balancer://a
...
/Proxy
VirtualHost *:80
ProxyPass / balancer://a stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid
/VirtualHost
In this case, two proxy_balancers are created. The first one in Proxy
section in the main
Hi,
didn't look at the patch yet, but the workaround for this is usually
to use ProxySet in the Proxy block.
I agree that it would be nice to have these parameters merged, though.
Regards,
Yann.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've found out that
But this way we lose the base ones that are not touched in the virtual host and
e.g. are only used by rewriterules.
So we should transfer the base ones to the merged array in any case and update
them where needed.
Isn't the config merge on a critical path with every request? So double for
loops
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
Isn't the config merge on a critical path with every request?
I don't think so, my understanding is that the *server* config merge
is before post_config.
Regards,
Yann.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
didn't look at the patch yet, but the workaround for this is usually
to use ProxySet in the Proxy block.
This is not (at all) equivalent to a merge, please ignore this...
Regards,
Yann.
On 12/10/2014 01:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
But this way we lose the base ones that are not touched in the virtual host and
e.g. are only used by rewriterules.
So we should transfer the base ones to the merged array in any case and update
them where needed.
Hm, you are
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/10/2014 01:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
Isn't the config merge on a critical path with every request? So double
for loops always worry me a little bit from performance point of view.
I think that
On 12/10/2014 02:50 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/10/2014 01:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
Isn't the config merge on a critical path with every request? So double
for loops always worry me a little bit from
On 12/10/2014 02:21 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 12/10/2014 01:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
But this way we lose the base ones that are not touched in the virtual host
and e.g. are only used by rewriterules.
So we should transfer the base ones to the merged array in any case and
10 matches
Mail list logo
