Isn't this already addressed/handled with the BalancerInherit directive??
On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:25 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've found out that following configuration does not work as expected:
Proxy balancer://a
...
/Proxy
VirtualHost *:80
ProxyPass /
Why? If a balancer is used just in a Vhost, then it should be
defined just in that Vhost. I can't see adding complexity and
workarounds to hack around what is a simple config error.
On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
didn't look at the patch yet, but
Hi,
No need for a CHANGE entry ?
CJ
Le 16/12/2014 14:06, j...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jim
Date: Tue Dec 16 13:06:48 2014
New Revision: 1645936
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1645936
Log:
Merge r1642868 from trunk:
mpm_event: follow up to r1639614 (trunk) and r1642858 (2.4.x).
Notify
On 12/16/2014 01:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Isn't this already addressed/handled with the BalancerInherit directive??
No, it isn't. The BalancerInherit only says that the balancers from the
main config will be copied to vhost context *after* the config_tree is
processed. And the word
