It seems that httpd.a.o still refers to 2.4.12, whereas 2.4.16
effectively reached www.a.o/dist/httpd and mirrors (leading to 2.4.16
not being visible and 2.4.12 issuing 404s).
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
After 72+ hours, and with all +1 votes (more
The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.31, can be found in;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.2.31 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr-util 1.5.4)
Win32 src to follow in an hour this round. With such an insignificant
set of changes to a generally approved 2.2.30
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.16 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project
are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.16 of the Apache
HTTP Server (Apache). This version of Apache is our latest GA
release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache
Yup, 2.2.31 built fine, and surprisingly it had the ssl deps change too.
I put the nmake into a retry loop :)
And now it's all automated.
Yay.
Thanks for the help,
Andy
On 07/15/2015 10:22 AM, Andy Wang wrote:
On 07/14/2015 09:37 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 7/14/2015 12:09 PM, Andy Wang
On 07/15/2015 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.31, can be
found in;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[X] Release 2.2.31 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr-util 1.5.4)
The diffs look good to me.
I ran the test suite on FreeBSD 10 and
Hi all,
since 2.4.10 and 2.2.29 the annou...@httpd.apache.org is abandoned. Is this
intentional?
Someone already asked about this last year:
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-devm=141157921203967w=2
If this is not the right list to ask this question, where should it be
addressed then?
b.
PS:
On 7/15/2015 9:44 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.31, can be found in;
[+1] Release 2.2.31 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr-util 1.5.4)
Thanks for the quick turnaround RM!
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
+/-1
[+1] Release 2.2.31 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr-util 1.5.4)
Retested worker and prefork, included apr-1.5.2 and apr-util-1.5.4, on:
- Debian 8 - 64bit,
- Debian 7 - 64bit,
- Debian 6 - 64bit,
- Debian 6 - mixed
*grin*
On Jul 15, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de
wrote:
...are amusing when looked at closely:
# testing : GET /modules/include/file.shtml
# expected: 'Donnerstag, Juli 9, 2015 Donnerstag, Juli 9, 2015 1436433857
1436433857'
# received: 'Thursday, July
...are amusing when looked at closely:
# testing : GET /modules/include/file.shtml
# expected: 'Donnerstag, Juli 9, 2015 Donnerstag, Juli 9, 2015 1436433857
1436433857'
# received: 'Thursday, July 9, 2015 Thursday, July 9, 2015 1436433857
1436433857'
not ok 59
;-)
green/bytes GmbH
Hafenweg
On 07/14/2015 09:37 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 7/14/2015 12:09 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
link.exe -lib @C:\Users\runtime\AppData\Local\Temp\nm9E02.tmp
c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.exe -
nologo -f libaprutil.mak CFG=libaprutil - Win32 Release
...got the test framework to PASS on my OS X against httpd/trunk built.
I added more description of what I found in the README and checked that in. I
have the attached patch to the test code itself, which I will not just dump on
you. I think the changes are ok, but will wait for some feedback.
12 matches
Mail list logo
