Hi,
spotted bu cppcheck.
Le 17/04/2017 à 11:17, ic...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: icing
Date: Mon Apr 17 09:17:55 2017
New Revision: 1791669
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1791669&view=rev
Log:
On the trunk:
mod_http2: MaxKeepAliveRequests now limits the number of times a
slave c
On Apr 30, 2017 12:27 PM, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sun, 30 Apr 2017 08:54:34
-0700):
>On 4/30/2017 5:36 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>
>> The problem with CMake is that it does not build all things, that AL and
>> AH put in their distributions. CMake will build Apr
On Apr 29, 2017 9:19 PM, "Gregg Smith" wrote:
On 4/29/2017 5:19 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Bill, viewing the complete thread your reasoning here should have
> precluded this discussion years ago when pcre went to cmake, so at or
> before 2.4.0. After all, it's the only way to build pcre which is a
Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sun, 30 Apr 2017 08:54:34
-0700):
>On 4/30/2017 5:36 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>
>> The problem with CMake is that it does not build all things, that AL and
>> AH put in their distributions. CMake will build Apr 1.6 and Apr-util
>> 1.6, including apr_crypto_ope
2017-04-19 10:05 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>
> 2017-03-27 19:09 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>> Hi Yann,
>>
>> 2017-03-27 8:56 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic :
>>
>>> Hi Luca,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Luca Toscano
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Documentation updated with the current status, plus th
On 4/30/2017 5:36 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
The problem with CMake is that it does not build all things, that AL and
AH put in their distributions. CMake will build Apr 1.6 and Apr-util
1.6, including apr_crypto_openssl-1.dll (1.0.2 or 1.1.0) in one go.
Yes Jan I realize this but "recommend" do
Jan Ehrhardt in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:36:57
+0200):
>*.mak files in apr-util + the Makefile.win's in apr-util\(ces|css)
*.mak files in apr-iconv + the Makefile.win's in apr-iconv\(ces|css)
Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 29 Apr 2017 17:19:03
-0700):
>I have no problem with "recommending" folks use cmake, none at all. I
>find it to be a pain in the backside but that's just me. Others may
>share this but I will not stand in the way of simply "recommending" it.
>I'm actu
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned