> On 1 Jun 2017, at 17:15, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Jim Riggs wrote:
>>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs
wrote:
>> On 1 Jun 2017,
On 05/31/2017 08:11 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
+1 to no-longer-experimental.
+1 to RTC.
+1 to both.
--Jacob
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> There was discussion some time ago about dropping the "experimental"
>> tag from our HTTP/2 implementation. It is causing loads of people
>> to not use it, as well as allowing for the p
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Jim Riggs wrote:
>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs
>>> wrote:
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski
> wrote: 2. I understand the l
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2. I understand the logic behind creating the arrays, but doesn't
this incre
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote:
>>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions:
>>>
>>> 1. The style, esp with array usage is different; eg APR_ARRAY
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote:
>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions:
>>
>> 1. The style, esp with array usage is different; eg APR_ARRAY_PUSH
>> and APR_ARRAY_IDX... any particular reason why?
>
>
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions:
>
> 1. The style, esp with array usage is different; eg APR_ARRAY_PUSH
> and APR_ARRAY_IDX... any particular reason why?
Well, we don't seem to be entirely consistent with
On 05/02/2017 10:14 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote> On 04/28/2017 10:50 PM,
Jacob Champion wrote:
...why does the EOR bucket have memory ownership of a request_rec,
especially when its lifetime is not well defined? And why have we
put business logic into a finalizer? This is ringing all of my
memory ma
I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions:
1. The style, esp with array usage is different; eg APR_ARRAY_PUSH
and APR_ARRAY_IDX... any particular reason why?
2. I understand the logic behind creating the arrays, but doesn't
this increase the overhead. We go th
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> - B. People come out and say: "when experimental is gone, I might finally
>> find the time to improving HTTP/2 support with the great ideas and/or long
>> time experience that I have!"
>>
>
> There is that as well... it's no good having a
> On Jun 1, 2017, at 4:40 AM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>
> What could a change of "experimental" do?
>
> - A. It could address the FUD. Which I assume is important for market shares.
> And for people who have done serious investments (successful ones) in httpd
> in the past, be it money or ti
> Am 31.05.2017 um 17:46 schrieb William A Rowe Jr :
>
> I have the impression that the developers still believe HTTP/2
> proxy is still 'experimental' / work-in-progress. Notably, there is
> a large pile of duplicate functionality in the modules/http2/ tree
> which should already be promoted to
13 matches
Mail list logo
