Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-25 Thread William A Rowe Jr
That would have been a good fix to include, but the release has been tagged. If it is voted down on some other defects and we roll 2.2.34, I would concur. But there is no defined single char header, and x- headers are always 3+ chars by definition. So I don't look at this one as a showstopper.

Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-25 Thread Mark Blackman
> On 14 Jun 2017, at 22:12, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > Thoughts/comments? Patches to hold for before we roll? If I don't hear > otherwise, and we stick to the simpler alternative, then I'd plan to roll > these candidates Thursday. Would it be an option to get a fix in

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2017/06/25]

2017-06-25 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned