Re: change the CHANGES

> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:58 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > My main motivation was the RM work. I never did it, but from what > I see, it involves a lot of manual labor and that is a bit ridiculous > in our line of work, IMO, YMMV, etc. > The effort required

Re: build mod_systemd static

Am 27.03.2018 um 13:52 schrieb Eric Covener: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> i've backported mod_systemd to httpd 2.4 which was / is very straight >> forward. >> >> Now i would like to build mod_systemd statically

Re: build mod_systemd static

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Hello, > > i've backported mod_systemd to httpd 2.4 which was / is very straight > forward. > > Now i would like to build mod_systemd statically but don't get it. > > While --enable-unixd=static work

build mod_systemd static

Hello, i've backported mod_systemd to httpd 2.4 which was / is very straight forward. Now i would like to build mod_systemd statically but don't get it. While --enable-unixd=static work fine --enable-systemd=static still builds it as a shared module. Any hints? Greets, Stefan

Re: change the CHANGES

I do not fully buy the "we have to do manual editing anyway..." argument, but we developers can live with the state things are. My main motivation was the RM work. I never did it, but from what I see, it involves a lot of manual labor and that is a bit ridiculous in our line of work, IMO, YMMV,

Re: Apache server-status Monitoring / why is it only available through http?

might this be something - where mod_systemd can be extended? I have never used it but it already seems to provide some stats. Am 26.03.2018 um 12:17 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: > > Am 24.03.2018 um 15:28 schrieb Eric Covener: >> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Stefan Priebe -