Hi,
Il giorno mer 25 set 2019 alle ore 13:18 Mads Toftum
ha scritto:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Luca Toscano wrote:
> > Does the above make sense or it is completely out of scope for our
> > project? In the former case I could spend some time on figuring out
> > how to create
Hi Daniel,
Il giorno mer 25 set 2019 alle ore 13:24 Daniel Ruggeri
ha scritto:
>
> I'm a big fan of this idea - it's how I do testing :-)
>
> Unfortunately, I ran into a few issues trying to build and test with Debian
> maintained dependencies and only ended up with one working test suite:
https://news.slashdot.org/story/19/09/26/1710239/cloudflare-google-chrome-and-firefox-add-http3-support
With that, the obvious question: what about Apache?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 8:20 AM Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Yann Ylavic
> >
> > Likewise, I think the MPMs themselves shouldn't use pchild for their
> > internal allocations possibly still in use at exit().
> > So v2 (attached) may be
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. September 2019 15:10
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: clean_child_exit and watchdog threads
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 3:07 PM Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, far less likely, but still:
>
>
