Re: trunk APR version requirement

2019-11-12 Thread Stefan Eissing
Very happy about this. Thanks a lot! > Am 12.11.2019 um 16:10 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:43 PM Luca Toscano wrote: >> >> Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 15:24 Eric Covener >> ha scritto: >>> 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail

Re: trunk APR version requirement

2019-11-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:43 PM Luca Toscano wrote: > > Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 15:24 Eric Covener > ha scritto: > > > > > > > > 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications > > > to dev@ on Friday. > > > > > > 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken

Re: trunk APR version requirement

2019-11-12 Thread Luca Toscano
Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 15:24 Eric Covener ha scritto: > > > > > 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications > > to dev@ on Friday. > > > > 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken bits of buildbot if > > nobody has salvaged it. > > +1 +1

Re: trunk APR version requirement

2019-11-12 Thread Eric Covener
> > 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications > to dev@ on Friday. > > 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken bits of buildbot if > nobody has salvaged it. +1

Re: trunk APR version requirement

2019-11-12 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Luca Toscano wrote: > Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 12:40 Joe Orton > ha scritto: > > > > Thanks to everyone who gave feedback, I made the change to require APR > > 1.6 in r1869684. While I kept the Travis builds passing, buildbot broke > > since

Re: trunk APR version requirement

2019-11-12 Thread Luca Toscano
Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 12:40 Joe Orton ha scritto: > > Thanks to everyone who gave feedback, I made the change to require APR > 1.6 in r1869684. While I kept the Travis builds passing, buildbot broke > since it's doing a trunk build against the system APR. Does anybody > know if

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

2019-11-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 2:01 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> > >> On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: > >>> Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? > >>> > >>> It

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

2019-11-12 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

2019-11-12 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: > > Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? > > > > It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are > > essentially answered questions rather than

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

2019-11-12 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite

modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

2019-11-12 Thread Eric Covener
Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites argumentation. -- Eric Covener

Re: trunk APR version requirement

2019-11-12 Thread Joe Orton
Thanks to everyone who gave feedback, I made the change to require APR 1.6 in r1869684. While I kept the Travis builds passing, buildbot broke since it's doing a trunk build against the system APR. Does anybody know if there is a buildbot slave running Bionic? Regards, Joe

buildbot failure in on httpd-trunk

2019-11-12 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder httpd-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/httpd-trunk/builds/4251 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave6_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler