I'm willing to RM APR and APR-util 1.7 releases.
Would propose we set a date out 2 weeks, anything lingering needs
to be finalized with the usual oversight no later than the 8th, and
we tag on the 14th, announce on the 15th when the mirrors have
caught up. That gives enough days for committers to
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 10:56:15AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 08:39:17AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > On 8/28/21 4:00 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:07 AM ste...@eissing.org
> > > wrote:
> > >> Related to that, do we exempt "./test" from RTC in
I think there are some jobs that are excluded if not "2.4.x", so it's
doing some trunk-only stuff.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 1:37 PM ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> Not sure what to make of this. I think testing a release candidate is fine,
> but
> I do not really see what was wrong.
>
> Maybe
Not sure what to make of this. I think testing a release candidate is fine, but
I do not really see what was wrong.
Maybe tomorrow, I see it...
- Stefan
> Am 02.09.2021 um 18:12 schrieb Travis CI :
>
> apache / httpd
> candidate-2.4.49
> Build #1856 failed24 mins and 12 secs
> Stefan
Build Update for apache/httpd
-
Build: #1859
Status: Failed
Duration: 24 mins and 2 secs
Commit: ababb7a (candidate-2.4.49)
Author: Stefan Eissing
Message: Post tag updates
git-svn-id:
Build Update for apache/httpd
-
Build: #1857
Status: Failed
Duration: 21 mins and 29 secs
Commit: d458b74 (candidate-2.4.49)
Author: Stefan Eissing
Message: release candidate 2.4.49
git-svn-id:
Build Update for apache/httpd
-
Build: #1856
Status: Failed
Duration: 24 mins and 12 secs
Commit: cd5b61d (candidate-2.4.49)
Author: Stefan Eissing
Message: release candidate 2.4.49
git-svn-id:
On 9/2/21 3:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Since you are going through this I wanted to mention:
>
> I think the public doc we have should mention everything that's done
> during ther release, even the security stuff that is somewhat private.
> The ASF-wide security policy is already public
>
Since you are going through this I wanted to mention:
I think the public doc we have should mention everything that's done
during ther release, even the security stuff that is somewhat private.
The ASF-wide security policy is already public
(https://www.apache.org/security/committers.html) and
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:21 AM ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> OK, small hickup. The build shell for the manuals wants a JDK 1.8 or 11...
> uhm...I need a time machine, or we can change the check there.
>
> Since I am not experienced in our manual stuff, can someone knowledgable
> check this?
If
OK, small hickup. The build shell for the manuals wants a JDK 1.8 or 11...
uhm...I need a time machine, or we can change the check there.
Since I am not experienced in our manual stuff, can someone knowledgable check
this?
- Stefan
> Am 01.09.2021 um 13:27 schrieb ste...@eissing.org:
>
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
