Re: 2.0.49 and 32bit vs. 64bit problem on sparc

On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: Andre Breiler wrote: What I noticed is that /status displays the last number of requested URIs just fine with the 32bit version but forgets about some requests (note counter is right) in the 64bit version. I'm not sure what is getting forgotten

2.0.49 and 32bit vs. 64bit problem on sparc

counter is right) in the 64bit version. (2.0.46 did have this problem afaik but I'll have look at the other versions later today). Andre' -- Andre' Breiler | Tel: +44 (0) 1628 40 BBC Internet Services | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk Maiden House, Vanwell Road | Maidenhead

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

and developers for helping out. Thanx to you for the work too. Andre' -- Andre' Breiler | Tel: +44 (0) 1628 40 BBC Internet Services | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk Maiden House, Vanwell Road | Maidenhead, SL6 4UB | Mail me if possible. And use a Subject line.

Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

-19 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R --- snap --- at least as well as 2.0.46. Andre' -- Andre' Breiler | Tel: +44 (0) 1628 40 BBC Internet Services | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk Maiden House, Vanwell Road | Maidenhead, SL6 4UB | Mail me if possible. And use a Subject

Re: 2.0.49 (rc3) tarballs available, WAS: Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

Hi, On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote: Hi, On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: Hi, There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I guess you didn't get around to do

Re: functions in SSI

me know what you think if I should go for the more flexible (imho) or the safer way. Happy weekend, Andre' Brian On Mar 11, 2004, at 6:46 AM, Andre Breiler wrote: Hi, I wonder what your opinion is on having functions in addition to variables in SSIs. An example would be --#set

functions in SSI

export a function so that other modules can register SSI functions as well. Andre -- Andre' Breiler | Tel: +44 (0) 1628 40 BBC Internet Services | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk Maiden House, Vanwell Road | Maidenhead, SL6 4UB | Mail me if possible. And use a Subject

Re: ap2 , parent process in worker mpm dies under load

Hi, On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: Andre Breiler wrote: the ap2 (2.0.43) parent process dies (but childs arn't) under load. This is with worker mpm on solaris 8 (multiprocessor). ... All seem to die with a SEGV or SIGBUS due to the fact that after returning from

ap2 , parent process in worker mpm dies under load

Hi, the ap2 (2.0.43) parent process dies (but childs arn't) under load. This is with worker mpm on solaris 8 (multiprocessor). I wonder if anyone has the same problem. What I have tried so far is: - compile with cc gcc - use differnt thread implementations - 32 64 bit . All seem to die with a