If this is the wrong list to ask for help on this please redirect me.
We are porting our application to Fedora 15 and to systemd from SysV init.
The httpd configuraturation we are using work without problem on earlier
Fedora 13 systems.
We are hitting an odd problem with httpd handling requests o
On 16/02/10 20:30, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
Author: poirier
Date: Tue Feb 16 20:24:33 2010
New Revision: 910673
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910673&view=rev
Log:
Fix compile warning (discarding constness of fname)
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk
Eric Covener wrote:
On 12/4/09, Barry Scott wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott
wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank
wrote:
In the interim, is mod_fastcgi
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank wrote:
In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really that bad?
mod_fastcgi is fine for handling GET/POST requests, but it fails to
implement
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank wrote:
In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really that bad?
mod_fastcgi is fine for handling GET/POST requests, but it fails to
implement
Authorization or Authenication.
So yes mod_fastcgi is really bad.
mod_fcgid is a ver
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
I have configure with a limit of 16 processes but have 17 running and logs
claiming 16 running.
You should probably open a bug report for this. That's not to say
that others haven't started thinkin
I have configure with a limit of 16 processes but have 17 running and
logs claiming 16 running.
Barry
httpd.conf fcgid config lines:
FcgidCmdOptions /usr/local/onelan/html/dsmauthorizer.fcgi MaxProcesses
16 IOTimeout 200
FcgidCmdOptions /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi MaxProcess
pqf wrote:
> Hi, all
> I am Ryan Pan, who wrote the first version of mod_fcgid.
> While I uesd mod_fastcgi(not mod_fcgid), one issue that bother me is: while
> a fastcgi process(created by mod_fastcgi's process manager process)in a dead
> loop, no one is respond to kick it out. So from tim
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
One test that needs doing is to have a Responder and an Authorizer running
for the same request. I'll see if I can do that test for you next week with
the pieces
I have.
Chris Darroch has a patch for that,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
...
Silly me. Chris's patch at
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/mod_fcgid_auth/mod_fcgid-1auth-trunk.patch
handles this, and it does send a trailing FCGI_STDIN record to an
authorizer.
Chris, AYT
I wonder if
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Variation number three:
As with your patch, it remembers to add the eos bucket to the brigade
of data sent to the app. As with my earlier patch, it doesn't send
the trailing FCGI_STDIN record.
In the spec (http://www.fastcgi.com/devkit/doc/fcgi-spec.html#S6.3),
there's no m
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
This has been filed as issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47973
Further testing of our application has shown up a problem using
mod_fcgid 2.3.4.
With the following configuration we are seeing the
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
Barry Scott wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another
candidate
for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted
mod_fcgid-2.3.4.tar.g
This has been filed as issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47973
Further testing of our application has shown up a problem using
mod_fcgid 2.3.4.
With the following configuration we are seeing the request body
of POST messages get stripped out if FcgidAuthorizer is used for
Barry Scott wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another
candidate
> for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted
mod_fcgid-2.3.4.tar.gz
> (or .tar.bz2) or the win32/netware suitable package
mod_fcgid-2.3.3
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another candidate
> for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted
mod_fcgid-2.3.4.tar.gz
> (or .tar.bz2) or the win32/netware suitable package
mod_fcgid-2.3.3-crlf.zip from:
>
> http://httpd.apac
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another candidate
for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.4.tar.gz
(or .tar.bz2) or the win32/netware suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.3-crlf.zip
from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev
Ricardo Cantu wrote:
On Friday 02 October 2009 11:10:25 am Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(instead of based on uri or vhost)
FCGIDCommand /p
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott <mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(instead of based on uri or vhost)
FCGIDCommand /path/to/command
IdleTimeout n
MaxProcessLifetime n
MinPr
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(instead of based on uri or vhost)
FCGIDCommand /path/to/command
IdleTimeout n
MaxProcessLifetime n
MinProcesses n
MaxProcesses n
MaxRequestsPerProcess n
InitialEnv var[=val] ...
(the names of these options follow my proposal for the names of
existing directi
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Barry Scott <mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>> wrote:
With mod_fastcgi I can to the following:
FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi -processes 1
-idle-timeout 200
FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/ds
With mod_fastcgi I can to the following:
FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi -processes 1 -idle-timeout 200
FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsmxml.fcgi -processes 1
-idle-timeout 30
Which creates two servers running waiting for request with only once
instance of each.
I cann
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Barry Scott
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>> wrote:
At this point let me ask this:
Is it possible with the current code to ever have the fcgid
Authorizer called?
yes
thanks for the confirmation and the example.
I no
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I borrowed a few ideas from my friends and botched the rest personally:
(omitting FCGID prefix)
leave alone
AccessChecker
AccessCheckerAuthoritative
Authenticator
AuthenticatorAuthoritative
Authorizer
AuthorizerAuthoritative
Wrapper
MaxRequestsPerProcess
PassHeader
It may
At this point let me ask this:
Is it possible with the current code to ever have the fcgid Authorizer
called?
If it is not possible I'm willing to try and code the missing pieces,
with a little
help being pointed in the right direction.
Barry
Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>
<mailto:barry.sc...@
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>
<mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
<
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott <mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk>> wrote:
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the
right place to ask.
I'm using mod_fcgid from svn with HTTPD 2.2.
I want to use a fast CGI
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the right
place to ask.
I'm using mod_fcgid from svn with HTTPD 2.2.
I want to use a fast CGI authorizer to allow me to control access based
on my rules.
The authorizer needs to be a long running process - never exits.
I know that t
29 matches
Mail list logo
