Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

2024-04-03 Thread Frank Gingras
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:16 AM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > > > Am 03.04.2024 um 14:26 schrieb Eric Covener : > > > > Hi all, > > > > (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of > 2.4.x...) > > > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > >

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

2024-02-15 Thread Frank Gingras
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:47 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: > Nobody gives a flying f what you released from trunk. I personally will be > dead and buried before you release httpd 3.0. So like you I don’t give a > damned what you do with it. > > I just want the warfare against existing libapreq2 users

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

2023-10-16 Thread Frank Gingras
+1 for me, Slackware64 15.0. Thanks for the RM, yes. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:43 AM Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > > > Please find below the proposed

Re: mod_wasm: Contributing Upstream to Apache

2023-06-01 Thread Frank Gingras
As per the instructions: To unsubscribe, send a messages to *users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org * (or, if you are subscribed to the digest version of the list, send to *users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org * ). You must send the unsubscribe message from the same email address that you used

Re: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56

2023-03-09 Thread Frank Gingras
Or use [B], while being aware of the drawbacks. On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:38 PM Fossies Administrator < jens.schleuse...@fossies.org> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, Eric Covener wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 12:14 PM wrote: > >> > >> On 3/9/23 05:30, Eric Covener wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On

Re: Process-level htaccess cache

2022-10-14 Thread Frank Gingras
Any reason this was based on the older 2.4.6 release? On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 19:24, wrote: > Hello, > > I work on a LAMP stack at a large e-commerce company. We have big htaccess > files filled with mod_rewrite rules which are slow to parse. Moving these > routes into httpd.conf would be more

Re: tcp send buffering and keepalive races

2022-05-30 Thread Frank Gingras
Can someone remove Nam Ho from the ML please? The spamming has been going on for weeks now. On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 05:31, Nam Hồ wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 30, 2022, at 16:21, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > >  > > > >> On 5/27/22 7:33 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > >> People might

Re: [apache]maxconnectionsperchild problem

2022-04-14 Thread Frank Gingras
You should direct your questions to us...@httpd.apache.org instead. In the meantime, what mpm are you using? On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 07:42, 刘孟 wrote: > I am sorry that is there anybody can answer my question? > > > > Hello, Mr Mentor > > > > I tried to translat it to English, please forgive my

Re: disallow HTTP 0.9 by default?

2021-07-22 Thread Frank Gingras
I agree with this as well, I haven't had to use 0.9 in over a decade. +1 On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 12:03, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2021, at 12:29 AM, Stefan Eissing < > stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > >> Am 21.07.2021 um 22:04 schrieb Eric Covener : > >> > >> I was chasing an

Re: cannot view website but apache seems to be working properly

2021-07-20 Thread Frank Gingras
Paul, First, d...@httpd.a.org is a development list, so you would want to ask us...@httpd.a.org for questions or help with httpd. However, your question falls outside the scope of both lists, since it looks like either a networking or DNS issue. Perhaps your linux distribution channel, or

Re: Changing mod_lua to stable

2018-12-17 Thread Frank Gingras
+1 On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:43 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 12/17/2018 08:23 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I've been pondering on the state of mod_lua, and it seems like it's time > to get rid of the 'experimental' note, which > > still scares off a lot of people. The API has

Spam on the httpd wiki (moin moin)

2016-07-06 Thread Frank Gingras
Hello folks, I was looking into spam added to the wiki recently, and found out that https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Face2Face was set to be editable by everyone. Presumably, that was done so that non-committers could make "quick" edits during apachecon, For the time being, I've removed the ACL