--On October 21, 2005 1:09:28 AM +0200 Maxime Petazzoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just commited a small changeset in order to compute the string
length only once in the function. But yes, we could rely on the
computed length earlier in the body processing.
I wonder if fixing the loop
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 12:08:15PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Except when we get a HEAD request, r-path_info is filled with bogus
data, which causes mod_mbox to crash way deep inside itself.
Why isn't r-path_info filled out correctly?
If the request's path_info itself is bogus, that should be
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:20:40AM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
The httpd-2.0.55 RC currently running on ajax had a segfault about an
hour ago, here's the backtrace.
Looks like a crash in mod_mobx, so I don't think it affects the httpd
release.
Paul, Sam, and I analyzed the cores and
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:31:42PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
There is now:
[Wed Oct 12 22:04:43 2005] [notice] child pid 5885 exit signal =20
Segmentation fault (11), possible coredump in /raid1/httpd-cores
Backtrace:
...
Note, this was /raid1/httpd-cores/core.5885 .
(gdb) print
--On October 11, 2005 1:24:22 PM -0400 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As has been pointed out, this is a trade off. You can get real
protection at the cost of losing the ability to find real email
addresses. Or you can get protection that will work against 95% or more
of current
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:46:57PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
1. Do we really want people subscribing to mailing lists using atom
over http? This would consume way more resources than a standard
mailing list subscription (due to the polling nature of atom). I don't
have any evidence, but
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:21:13PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Write the code. Send Patches. Then we have something to work with. If
mod_sitemap turns into anything, it might be possible to find it a place
inside the ASF.
Agreed. If and when a C module is written and submitted for discussion,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:47:51PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
This is my period reminder email that mod_mbox is regularly crashing on
ajax. Nothing more to add from my previous notes.
I no longer have the time to look into this. Sorry.
I tried to follow up with this before; but the crashes
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:11:01PM +0200, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
/me raises his hand. I still need to get in touch with the
administration scripts used for m-a.a.org, but I'm willing to help the
infra team, and my SoC gave me enough mod_mbox knowledge to handle it.
The scripts are what's in
--On October 6, 2005 12:23:22 PM -0700 Roy T. Fielding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What errors? Do you mean 404s on httpd (what I would expect) or
script errors on mbox processing (what I wouldn't expect unless
the mod_mbox scripts are horribly lame).
It's telling me that the list archives no
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Please don't use the -a option for rsync. use -rlptDv instead; we
shouldn't be trouncing the ownership of the destination files, cp
doesn't. I'd also add the --numeric-ids option, which will also prevent
rsync from doing the
--On September 30, 2005 1:43:50 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ship httpd-2.2.x.tar.gz (solo), and httpd-2.2.x-bundle.tar.gz which
includes all the sub-packages the user should likely need (including
pcre/apr/-util/expat/-iconv/)? Perhaps even
[ moving this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For those not on
the Subversion lists, Subversion has an issue with escaping the contents of
the httpd log. ]
--On September 27, 2005 7:17:59 PM +0200 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only \xx is used. Well, c2x is utilized, but
--On September 25, 2005 5:15:43 PM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please report on testing experiences and (if applicable) vote on
releasing httpd 2.1.8-BETA. We really want both positive and all
negative experiences with this release. The more bugs we find now, the
better the
--On September 24, 2005 9:58:26 AM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, we are getting to the point were I would rather just have a
hard depends on APR = 1.2.0
How about emitting a warning at configure-time if less than our latest
recommended version (say 1.2.0)? I would
--On September 7, 2005 10:01:19 AM -0400 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
While looking over implementing the lbmethod via the
provider, one deficiency hit me: there no way to get a
list of registered providers. I'm thinking about adding
a ap_list_providers() which would return a table
--On August 30, 2005 11:33:39 PM +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious. What about running the worker MPM with mod_cgi on Solaris
10? See also the discussion on
Re: svn commit: r264737 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/stopping.xml
between Colm and Joe.
Saw it; but I don't have time to
--On August 29, 2005 9:58:12 PM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I counted two votes about 2.1.7-beta:
+1: Brad, Joe
Passes httpd-test on Mac OS X 10.4.2.
+1 for beta. -- justin
--On August 30, 2005 8:54:57 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~colm/2.1.7-non-showstoppers.patch
+1 on all that for the 2.2.x branch in any case.
+1 here as well
+1 too on that set of changes. I think we hit RTC once the branch opens
towards GA -
--On August 30, 2005 10:46:01 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since Apachecon EU, it's also been running the worker MPM (on IA64). and
performance is up by around 9% in our benchmarks. In trunk's STATUS
there's a vote which seems have long since passed (positively) to make
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:10:25PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If folks aren't voting, will they be supporting the problem reports
that come in?
I count the following for 2.1.7 beta (Paul missed a bunch of votes):
+1: Joe, Brad, Jeff, Jim, Justin.
-1: OtherBill ('no one voted')
How
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:36:59AM +0200, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
Ok, let's start again. mod_mbox is not in the HTTPd core, so its
documentation does not belong to the httpd/httpd/docs/ part of the
repository.
Attached, a small patch adding a stub website for mod_mbox to the
httpd/site/
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:28:37AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:12:24AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
%{tid}P gets you thread id in decimal now.
%{hextid}P would show it in hex using relatively new apr_sprintf()
format, added in 1.2.0.
Seems fine except that it
--On August 29, 2005 11:52:18 AM +0200 Maxime Petazzoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, thanks for your reply, I was looking forward to having
mod_mbox's original author comments !
Ha! =)
Ok, if it crashes it means we won't have any debugging information. If
you have a couple of
--On August 28, 2005 7:26:16 PM +0200 Maxime Petazzoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- mod_mbox offers an AJAX browser (YY.mbox/browser) for dynamic
archive browsing to Javascript capable browsers. Still, the AJAX
browser is known to be working only in Gecko-based browser for the
moment.
I just had to upgrade my personal server to Solaris 10. With 2.0.54, I'm now
getting the mod_cgid process (Worker MPM) taking up GBs of memory. Eek.
The closest PR I can find is 29528.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29528#c10
In it, Joe said he had some patches to fix
--On August 26, 2005 1:49:01 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. If you must use mod_cgid on Solaris 10, go back to the next to
last Solaris Express driver prior to GA ;) Recently I applied the
latest Solaris 10 updates and retested, without success.
Yup, my box has all
--On August 26, 2005 1:58:05 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may use this as an excuse to play with dtrace some as well.
That's what I thought ;) The problem I found is that observing more
than one side of the socket makes it work. But good luck to you!!!
Works for me. I
--On August 26, 2005 3:00:13 PM -0700 Justin Erenkrantz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to write this up and throw it at some of the OpenSolaris devs and
see if they have any ideas. -- justin
Score one for the Solaris folks being around at 4pm on a Friday. I've
summarized
--On August 24, 2005 4:58:14 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: colm
Date: Wed Aug 24 09:58:11 2005
New Revision: 239711
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239711view=rev
Log:
Implement de-listening for graceful restarts with the prefork MPM. With
this change;
1.) httpd -k
--On August 24, 2005 4:21:38 PM +0100 Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is it time we introduced a general-purpose apr_http_client?
I'd be prepared to offer my code as a startingpoint, but I'd rather
not take the driving seat for further development and documentation.
We already went down
--On August 17, 2005 12:09:39 PM -0700 Justin Erenkrantz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. I'll hopefully get around to this in the next day or so. -- justin
I've now updated ajax to trunk. -- justin
--On August 23, 2005 10:50:45 AM -0400 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had to turn off core dumps from httpd on ajax, because they were
quickly filling up our /tmp directory.
Below is another backtrace that appears a little different from the
first. (I don't believe the module on
--On August 23, 2005 5:03:03 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add APR_FOPEN_BINARY to the options passed to apr for opening the
cache header files.
Why? -- justin
--On August 23, 2005 8:18:44 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because mod_disk_cache uses;
APR_CREATE | APR_WRITE | APR_BINARY | APR_EXCL
when creating them, see inside store_headers at mod_disk_cache.c:892
It would have been helpful if you had noted that in the
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:54:01PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:30 AM 8/19/2005, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 8/19/05, Kaushal Jha - ZEDO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey guys,
I observed that only apache 1.3 (1.3.33) sends out the
extra characters as shown below
--On August 18, 2005 3:59:05 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thinking about it, everything is going into memory anyway, so why not
just stat() the file and read it all in in one go?
We know it's never going to be that big anyway. This completely
minimises the number of
--On August 18, 2005 9:24:57 AM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:17:41PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Content definitely should not be served from the cache after it has
expired imo. However I think an approach like;
if((now + interval
--On August 18, 2005 9:55:57 AM -0400 Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why do we pass request_rec to recall_headers, but not to recall_body. We
also always pass r-pool. How horrible would it be if the prototype was
changed to:
apr_status_t (*recall_body) (cache_handle_t *h, request_rec
--On August 18, 2005 1:34:56 PM -0400 Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The optimizations that Colm is talking about should be helpful everywhere.
Also, that's why we test to make sure it does kill us. Also, I don't think
we know it will kill us.
None of the code in mod_disk_cache used
--On August 17, 2005 1:10:22 PM -0400 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin... Would it be possible for you to try this out on ajax. I could
try to do it myself, but I would need to replicate your setup.
I don't think the core dumps are creating any real problem, but I hate to
see them
--On August 17, 2005 3:01:03 PM -0400 Akins, Brian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch allows one to override the values of some headers so that they
vary to the same value.
Config Example:
# all lines that have gzip set one variable
SetEnvIf Accept-Encoding gzip gzip=1
# browsers that have
--On August 17, 2005 9:52:32 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Content definitely should not be served from the cache after it has
expired imo. However I think an approach like;
if((now + interval) expired) {
if(!stat(tmpfile)) {
--On August 17, 2005 9:29:05 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why bother renaming the file for such an implementation? If a
half-cached file can be served from, and this handled properly, the
rename would no longer make any sense :)
For a disk cache it would be tricky to
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
My main reason is that I can't enable or disable caching on a
per-directory or per-file basis.
The quick handler runs well before any knowledge is available about the
backend (dir/file). The only thing you know is the URI
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:55:34AM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
mod_cache configurability sucks big-time. CacheEnable adds yet another
location mapping scheme for administrators to deal with, but this scheme
lacks basic flexibility;
It can't reliably disable caching for a directory.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
More mod_cache fix-ups;
CacheEnable /
isn't very useful for forward proxy servers. This patch makes;
CacheEnable /
CacheEnable ftp://
CacheEnable http://somesite/
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:20:59AM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:02:04PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The quick handler runs well before any knowledge is available about the
backend (dir/file). The only thing you know is the URI path:
unsurprisingly
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:06:08AM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Just wondering what vim-users here may be using for help with coding in
the Apache style. Currently I have;
set tabstop=4
set shiftwidth=4
set expandtab
Which are all reasonably obvious, but thought
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:11:46PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Cool. I'd split dnsbl_zones into ipv4_dnsbl_zones and ipv6_dnsbl_zones
and have the DnsblZones directive work like;
DnsblIPv4Zones
DnsblIPv6Zones
FWIW, I think it'd be fine to have DnsblZones implicitly be
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:38:04AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Thu Aug 11 23:38:01 2005
New Revision: 232218
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=232218view=rev
Log:
* support/htcacheclean.c (directory_empty): Remove unused function.
*smacks head*
Thanks! I
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:38:40AM +0200, Plm, Rdiger, VIS wrote:
In the case that you are caching a response from a backend app server or
a cgi script I can imagine situations where one variant is 404 and another
one is not. Dw also pointed that out.
From my personal point of view we should
--On August 8, 2005 9:46:52 PM +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
log_correction.diff:
...
dir_removal_patch.diff:
Committed in r232335 and r232334, respectively.
Thanks! -- justin
--On August 10, 2005 11:36:43 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Aug 10 16:36:39 2005
New Revision: 231355
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=231355view=rev
Log:
Fix ProxyPassReverse family to work correctly in Location
This commit broke the build.
--On August 11, 2005 10:21:37 AM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:38:17PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On August 8, 2005 1:25:46 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
O.k., I've merged our two patches, but I've changed a few
--On August 10, 2005 7:26:44 AM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since most of these scripts (create-site-index in particular) are
dedicated to mail-archives.a.org, I don't believe they belong to the
mod_mbox repository (more in something like the infra repos for
example).
--On August 8, 2005 1:25:46 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
O.k., I've merged our two patches, but I've changed a few things, tell
me if there's anothing you think is wrong;
Would you mind writing up a log message for this patch?
I've lost track of what it's supposed to
--On August 8, 2005 1:58:53 AM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And since nothing says it like code, here's a patch to htcacheclean
which adds a -t option to clean out empty directories.
Thanks! Committed a variant in r231351.
FWIW, I agree with Andreas and Rüdiger. =) --
--On August 8, 2005 1:46:30 PM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-1 (vote, not veto).
-1 as well.
It should be reviewed, regardless of being on applicable to 2.0. Put it
in the status file, just like everything else. I feel that being in
'experimental' is not a good excuse for
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:02:29PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
and since I can't update to fix (2) myself, here's another...
Try again. All should be operational again. -- justin
--On July 21, 2005 6:30:36 PM +0200 Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry. This is actually my very first code patch in all the years I've
been working with Apache. Picking a nit. Will fix.
No worries - by all means, feel free to commit! Just expect that we'll treat
your commits with
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:23:38PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-if (!strcmp(w, file-group)) {
+if (!cmpstri(w, file-group)) {
Um, what's this? Shouldn't that be strcasecmp? -- justin
--On July 18, 2005 1:19:54 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us, trawick, orton and myself come to mind, are still up
for supporting our current users. As it is, backports aren't
reviewed, or committed once they are (I even split STATUS just to
call out
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:51:09PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] Revert the cookie to AP20 for httpd-2.1 and httpd-2.2
[ ] Leave the cookie at AP21 and bump again to AP22 w/httpd-2.2
[X] Get it over with already and bump now to AP22 for httpd-2.1
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:26:13PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I therefore Call A Vote on whether we should support mod_ftp for
inclusion into the Incubator and if we should accept mod_ftp upon
graduation from the Incubator.
+1. -- justin
--On July 6, 2005 4:30:49 PM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then we should remove them from trunk today. Why leave a 'flat-out
wrong' API available?
If no one has removed them from trunk by the hackathon next weekend, I will
remove them then. -- justin
--On July 4, 2005 11:08:18 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It still is not 'correct' until REQUEST_CHUNKED_PASS is reimplemented
and passes some chunk headers, since we aren't echoing the entire
request. But it gets me further on testing 1.3 - 2.0 - 2.1 - 2.0 -
1.3
--On June 30, 2005 12:33:24 AM -0500 Jem Berkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I'm another student working on mod_smtpd
If they haven't already, your mentors should be getting in touch with you
soon. (It's their responsibility to inform you of the details.)
In short, you need to fill
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 02:39:43PM -0700, Roy Fielding wrote:
The dev list needs some new blood (and new ideas) and these folks
aren't going to learn anything about real Apache development if
they are stuck out in the suburbs.
++1. -- justin
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:59:12AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Does anyone see a reason not to resurrect REQUEST_CHUNKED_PASS?
I have no idea what you are talking about (your email is vague on context);
but we should certainly not reintroduce the kludges associated with
--On Friday, June 24, 2005 11:09 AM -0700 Paul Querna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, .Z is more than twice as big as bz2. I don't see any reason to keep
including it, since every modern system has gzip, or can get it.
+1. -- justin
--On June 19, 2005 5:33:14 PM +0100 Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AddOutputFilterByType has always been problematic. I see there's another bug
report this month arising from it:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33499
Since the purpose of this directive is now available
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 10:06:30AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
I believe so. Yes, it clutters the code, but my objective is to have a
switch where I can easily add logging to the common case code, and leave
it in there, instead of deleting it before I commit. I think in the
long run, we
--On Monday, June 6, 2005 8:24 PM +0200 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Personally I prefer entire tree branches.
Agreed. This setup is going to make it difficult to test. -- justin
--On Tuesday, June 7, 2005 6:16 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Jun 7 11:16:12 2005
New Revision: 188837
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=188837view=rev
Log:
Sandbox of apr/trunk/ for fips integration. Here may lurk fips issues
(MD5 etc)
Added:
--On Monday, June 6, 2005 4:01 PM +0200 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So this is the same problem reported here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200505.mbox/%3c428F94
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which Sander said he was working on. Any progress? The cache is kind
of
--On Tuesday, June 7, 2005 1:50 PM -0700 Justin Erenkrantz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to be a better way. For now, I'll commit a fix that matches what we did
with mod_proxy; but this pattern keeps emerging. -- justin
I'm not going to commit it yet. However, I'm building a new httpd on ajax
--On Tuesday, June 7, 2005 7:13 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+APR_HOOK_STRUCT(
+#if AP_ENABLE_EXCEPTION_HOOK
+APR_HOOK_LINK(fatal_exception)
+#endif
+APR_HOOK_LINK(monitor)
+)
+
gcc (at least the one on RHEL3) forbids the use of preprocessor
conditionals inside of a macro. So,
--On Wednesday, June 8, 2005 12:09 AM +0200 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right I forgot this. So I think this would be better:
FWIW, I *think* the patch should return result rather than the value of
ap_pass_brigade. (Although I have a feeling that might not be
--On Tuesday, June 7, 2005 7:14 PM -0400 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Go for it. What are our production servers for if not testing httpd
patches ;-)
As a data point (and one I think you alluded to earlier), the LA on the box
was about 30 before I turned on the cache. It's now
--On Wednesday, June 8, 2005 12:49 AM +0100 Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, I've updated it thusly. But what version of gcc is that?
I'm using gcc 3.3.4, and that was happy with it.
% gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/specs
Configured with:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:40:41PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Justin, how's your stack of round tuits?
Not plentiful at the moment. =(
Can we keep the caching running on port 81 on ajax? That'll make it easier to
debug if I do get some time. We'd really need to see what the
--On Friday, May 13, 2005 9:07 PM +0200 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of calling it branches/2.1.x, on IRC wrowe suggested going
straight to branches/2.2.x, and on further thought I agree.
I don't agree.
Votes on going straight to 2.2.0-alpha?
-0.5 on calling it 2.2.x.
I'm seeing it
--On Wednesday, May 11, 2005 6:49 PM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I propose the following policy apply to the 2.2.x branch, once (and if)
it is created:
Before GA: A 'soft' CTR. Any small bug fixes can be directly committed.
Any API changes must be reviewed by the list. (lazy
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:34:38AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Let me suggest, instead, that every proxy between here and
Timbuktu suffers the same problem from your example.
Better, methinks, is for mod_rewrite to toggle Vary: for the
envvar that triggered its rewrite. This is
--On Friday, April 29, 2005 3:45 PM -0700 Paul Querna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am proposing the branch date be May 13, 2005.
++1. -- justin
--On Monday, May 2, 2005 3:33 PM -0400 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought the whole idea about having a 2.1 dev version was to avoid
monkeying around with the API and the problems when we were doing
1.3 and 2.0. Once we branch, it is possible that we'll run into
issues that may
--On Monday, April 25, 2005 12:47 PM -0500 Rici Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Regardless of any other changes to the brigade API, this seems to me to
be a good idea:
Index: util_filter.c
===
--- util_filter.c (revision 158730)
--On Monday, April 25, 2005 3:06 PM -0500 Rici Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can you quantify that large overhead? In the case of a 'compliant'
filter, it consists of:
With Joe's suggestion for 'creator must destroy', this step is wholly
unnecessary and only overcomplicates things. -- justin
--On Monday, April 25, 2005 4:47 PM -0500 Rici Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
explicit cleanup, while we continue thrashing out that issue. (nd -- do
you have a test suite, by any chance?)
httpd-test's has a bunch of tests for mod_include. -- justin
--On Monday, April 25, 2005 9:34 PM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Plus, I hear those new dual core opterons are really nice. I would
rather have a better and cleaner API, than save a few CPU cycles here.
The posted patch does nothing to make the brigades or filter a cleaner API.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:04:54AM +0530, Devendra Singh wrote:
Hi,
I am writing to the Developer List because I did not get any response on
the Users List and thought that the topic might be relevant to the dev list.
If a request comes for a directory w/o trailing slash, it gets cached
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:16:29AM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't being clear. AP_MODE_EATCRLF is not a renaming
of AP_MODE_GETLINE; it is a renaming of AP_MODE_PEEK. (The renaming
happened some three years ago in revision 92928, obviously I'm not
al tanto.) To be more precise, it's
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:36:07AM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
Are there browsers which send more than four extraneous CRLF's but
still support keepalive?
If this code reads four CRLF's without finding any data, it will assume
that there is no immediate incoming request, and send a flush down
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:56:38AM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
Rici Lake wrote:
I was taking a look at the implementation of the renamed (but still
misleading) AP_MODE_EATCRLF,
AP_MODE_PEEK was more accurate, but whatever...
No, it certainly wasn't, but let's not re-open old wounds. ;-)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:09:39AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
This would save us from the extra round trip. I'm not sure where else we
could even place such a check besides ap_pass_brigade. -- justin
Thinking about this a little bit more:
There's no reason we couldn't do the following
--On Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:25 AM +0200 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
+1.
Passes httpd-test on Darwin with the unexpected success on include
--On Wednesday, April 6, 2005 10:42 AM -0400 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm pretty-much done shredding the default config and I will give a
couple days for review before I merge it. Feel free to correct any
problems you see.
+1 to merge back to trunk. (14k vs. 38k. Yay!)
One last
--On Wednesday, April 6, 2005 12:29 PM -0400 Rich Bowen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about mod_ssl being on in most?
In the past, we've said that SSL must be explicit because of the crypto
legal restrictions. -- justin
--On Wednesday, April 6, 2005 9:15 AM -0700 Paul Querna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed mod_imap this morning from 'yes' to 'most', because I was tired
of disabling it every time I do a new install. I think we should
reconsider what modules are enabled by default. Here is my list of
401 - 500 of 1873 matches
Mail list logo
