Re: Dispatching MPM

? This way two MPMs, one process-based and one thread-based, could be created from the same codebase, allowing admins to select the one that's best for their setup. Forgive me if I've hit on a technical impossibility - my coding skills have sadly deteriorated since university. Thanks, -- Nick

UNIX MPMs

of the other UNIX Apache 2 MPMs at some point? Failing that, maybe the documentation for Apache 2 could be updated to avoid giving people the wrong impression from the outset. Thanks, Nick Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC for a Perchild-like-MPM

from my POV. PS. Not subscribed to the mailing list and checking this via gmane. So, copying replies to me is a good idea if you want a response! Thanks, Nick Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: UNIX MPMs

fixed. If not, you/we really should tell everyone, and let it die its natural death. Maybe I've missed you doing this, but your docs do say work is ongoing on perchild... Thanks, Nick Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: UNIX MPMs

it. Hello Mads, That's fantastic. Could the docs at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mpm.html be updated to reflect this too? Thanks, Nick Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC for a Perchild-like-MPM

traffic would go through this frontend process (and thus the UID owning it). This would preclude our traffic measures from having any meaning. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? -- Nick Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]