> Nope.
>
> My test client is a Perl SOCKET level IO deal and I am able
> to send EXACTLY what was in your email as the 'fake' Treo
> request, including the 'messed up' Host:redowadev.esri.com
> header which is missing the SPACE character after the colon.
>
> Doesn't make any difference here.
>
I tried digging into the code a bit with gdb with mixed results. The
Treo actually would sync up properly sometimes even without the Host
fix in place as long as I was running in gdb. Maybe some sort of
timing issue?
Anwyays, I never saw it hit a backend->close = 1 line -- at least not
in mod_pr
Believe I may have this working now.
The Treo was sending its Host header as follows:
Host:
(Note the lack of space betwen the colon and hostname. This probably
isn't valid but was corrected by Apache as it proxied the request on to
IIS. However, maybe the initial invalid header there somehow
> I have a feeling you have other components in play here and one
> of them might be the culprit that is always adding the 'Connection: close'
> to the OPTIONS request. Some home-grown and/or commercial filter or
> something? Another ( invisible/broken ) Proxy in the mix that's automatically
> addi
Late reply on this -- I had to spend time on other projects. :) I have
a dedicated test proxy set up now so it's easier to capture the correct
packets now and experiment.
> Sounds you are just stuck in the middle trying to deal with a broken
> client. I thought you might be trying to actually imp
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:03:23PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Your posts keep saying "The Treo does this" and the "Treo does
> that" and "likelihood of fixing Treos is 0 percent"...
>
> ...but I'm a little confused.
>
> What SOFTWARE are we talking about on the "Treo".
> The "Treo" is j
> > My most feasible option is to try and see if this is something that can
> > be addressed within Apache. An option to allow a persistent connection
> > in the scenario above might help.
>
> Try to get the Treo into different connection-handling logic
> altogether and see if that helps. Maybe
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:59:41PM -0700, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:59:30PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >
> > I promise to go and read through the RFC's, but if the Treo is
> > requesting a Keep-Alive connection, shouldn't Apache tr
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:52:11PM -0700, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On May 21, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > As I said, everything works fine this way. With mod_proxy in the mix
> > however:
> >
> > 1 TREO Sends OPTIONS request to Apache (Connecti
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:53:41AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:32:25AM -0700, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/22/2008 03:05 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > > I'm having a heck of a time getting Palm Treo's to work th
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:32:25AM -0700, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2008 03:05 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > I'm having a heck of a time getting Palm Treo's to work through our
> > Apache 2.2.3 based proxy talking to an OWA2K7 setup running on IIS.
I'm having a heck of a time getting Palm Treo's to work through our
Apache 2.2.3 based proxy talking to an OWA2K7 setup running on IIS. I
believe I may be getting pinched by:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43238
The Treo seems to work fine without a proxy. I observe the fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
