Some Guy wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any facility in the Apache libs that allows module developers to
act as a client? If not, I'll just use something like curl (or raw
sockets), but wanted to know if there was an Apache way to do this.
You'll have to co-opt a http client library or roll your
Andrej van der Zee wrote:
Hi William,
LoadFile
Saving on ink aren't you ;) Thanks for the advise, I will give it a go soon.
Just one question you might be able to answer. From the documentation
it looks like LoadFile is used to add additional code. In my case, I
need to override existing
Andrej van der Zee wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, that helps!
Since I am developing my modules in C++, I think I should be using this one:
apr_status_t apr_thread_data_set( void * data,
const char *key,
apr_status_t(*)(void *) cleanup,
Andrej van der Zee wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
AFAIK there's no support for such thing in apache. Have a look
yourself in server/mpm/worker/worker.c.
You can hook create_connection (the first hook offered by apache in a
thread after its creation). However, create_connection is called
Sorin Manolache wrote:
2009/3/16 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman bua...@buanzo.com.ar:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi! From within my module, I'd like to make an HTTP request from another HTTP
server, get something
from it, and use the returned information. What's the best way
Andrej van der Zee wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments. See below...
Worker mpm is a multithreaded, multiprocess mpm. Multiple child processes
host multiple worker threads that run your module code.
If your module services 2 concurrent requests in 2 different threads in the
same process and
Sorin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:08, Andrej van der Zee
andrejvander...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to modify Apache and run one custom background thread. In addition,
my custom modules have to be able to share a data structure with this
background thread. Did anybody do this
Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing a httpd module. This module is a content generator.
When a request comes to this module it has to forward it to a remote
machine. In that sense this module makes httpd acts like a proxy server.
Talking to a remote machine can take some time and
Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I have found this Event MPM for httpd. Is it
possible to use this for my scenario?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/event.html
Only from reading the description, I would say that you will need to
extend the mpm to meet your needs.
Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Saju Pillai saju.pil...@gmail.com wrote:
Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I have found this Event MPM for httpd. Is it
possible to use this for my scenario?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/event.html
Frank Meier wrote:
thanks for your replies, I tried the use of bucketbrigades as Chris
Kukuchka suggested. Unfortunately this lead to the same behaviour.
I also tried the *hack* approach (accessing the socket directly), where
I had the problem of getting to the socket itself. I didn't
Frank Meier wrote:
Hi
I'm working with a proprietary apache module which communicates (through
a socket) with another backend application (I have the C source code of
the module). I've now found out, when the client closes the http
connection during a request, the module does not see that the
Shibu Narendranathan wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to implement a proprietary encryption mechanism on an
existing apache server.
What is desired is the following.
ClientServer
--|-
1) sends
fka...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
some of the initialization tasks of my module must not be
done repeatedly with each spawned server process.
The post_config hook may help you.
Currently I init my module by ap_hook_child_init() and do
cleaning up by apr_pool_cleanup_register(), so each
fka...@googlemail.com wrote:
fka...@googlemail.com:
some of the initialization tasks of my module must not be
done repeatedly with each spawned server process.
To be more precise: There is only *one* vhost/configuration
here, however, due to the mpm settings (see below) apache
launches
On 22-Dec-08, at 6:49 PM, Andrej van der Zee wrote:
Hi,
You hook child_init (ap_hook_child_init) and store your data in
global
variables that are accessed by post_read_request and log_transaction.
BTW, in a worker-MPM, is child_init executed for every created
worker-thread? Or is it
2008/12/13 Saju Pillai saju.pil...@gmail.com:
On 13-Dec-08, at 1:02 PM, Mark Harrison wrote:
Sam Carleton wrote:
I am trying to use apr_strtok() for the first time. I am taking the
add_cookie() function from mod_rewrite.c, no changes. I am passing in
the string, variable 's
Greetings,
In an apache 2.2 module, how can i retrieve all of it's per_dir
config structures in the post_config hook ? Holding an explicit
reference to each per_dir config structure (when it is allocated)
within the module is possible but is slightly ugly. Is there a
recommended way to
On 20/04/07, Joe Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi Saju,
Actually I'm not sure this is my problem. I have tested my PHP extension
on numerous platforms and I have only ever seen the PHP extension
initialization / deinitialization routines run once for each restart.
Show us the compiler error. Maybe this is just a coding issue ?
-srp
On 19/04/07, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,
Im getting a error with a module im trying to compile using apxs.
What we have is two source files and a header.
File number one compiles fine, but once we try to run a
The apache config cycle will load - unload - load your module on
startup. Infact your module gets reloaded in for every restart
-srp
On 20/04/07, Michael B Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to track down a strange problem. I have a PHP extension
that is being deinitialized immediately
This question seems more suitable for the modules list.
Read Only data ? You may consider setting it up in post_config - alloc
from config pool. Your data will get copied into all children.
Read-Write data ? shm is ok. Any standard IPC should work.
-srp
On 20/04/07, moh bad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
I am attempting to write a apache 2.2 module that has per
dir/location directives. I need to examine all the per dir/location
module_config's for this mod.
Can I do something like ...
for (server = base_server; server; server = server-next) {
conf =
On 01/03/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Ames wrote: Saju Pillai wrote: I can understand why serializing apr_pollset_poll() accept() for the listener threads doesn't make sense in the event-mpm. A quick look
through the code leaves me confused about the following ...It looks like
a request line is already available for reading ? i.e on bsd (maybe) we can get better benchmarks if accept() read() at the same time.
regardssrpOn 01/03/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saju Pillai wrote: On 01/03/06, *Paul Querna* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Ames
On 01/03/06, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saju Pillai wrote: For a brand new client connection, why should there be 2 exchanges between the listener thread and the worker thread before the request is actually read ? The client socket is accepted() and passed to a worker thread which runs
Greetings,
The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll() / kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the large number of fd's to be polled and linear
On 02/03/06, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll() / kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the
On 02/03/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saju Pillai wrote: On 02/03/06, *Greg Ames* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll() / kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons
29 matches
Mail list logo
