We (the ASF) have services running using mod_lua. If we
trust it enough, others should as well.
Experimental and unstable will prevent many people from even
trying it. How about Cutting Edge?
On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 02.08.2013 14:41, Daniel
Hi dev@,
Though this is mainly a question for docs@, I thought I'd drop this
email into the dev@ list instead, since this is where I think
objections, if there are any, will arise.
Today, on various Internet channels, I have had to do my very best to
defend the use of mod_lua, ranging from people
On 2 Aug 2013, at 13:41, Daniel Gruno wrote:
In our documentation, we write the following:
mod_lua is still in experimental state. Until it is declared stable,
usage and behavior may change at any time, even between stable releases
of the 2.4.x series. Be sure to check the CHANGES file
How about marking specific interfaces and directives as experimental,
and providing the normal guarantees for the others?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
How about marking specific interfaces and directives as experimental,
and providing the normal guarantees for the others?
... And maybe splitting into two modules?
(how do I know if I'm using experimental features)
--
Eric
On 02.08.2013 14:41, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi dev@,
Though this is mainly a question for docs@, I thought I'd drop this
email into the dev@ list instead, since this is where I think
objections, if there are any, will arise.
Today, on various Internet channels, I have had to do my very best to
