Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/10/2006 12:21 PM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
context could be used. But I am thinking of sharing the balacing
information with another program.
By changing proxy_worker_stat * to a void * and arranging the
corresponding code the first step
On Jul 10, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Easy. See enclosed patch.
-1.
This breaks current behavior. +1 for the warning, but
-1 for the breakage.
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
===
---
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Once the shared data is accessed via a small API nothing prevent us
going on using the scoreboard but will allow to use any other
shared storage.
The scoreboard was never meant to be a central place where
modules are encouraged
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09.07.2006 16:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
So it makes sense from my perspective to
add a void pointer *to* the proxy_worker_stat structure to enable
balancers to store custom data that is private to them.
This already exists. See
On 07/10/2006 12:21 PM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
context could be used. But I am thinking of sharing the balacing
information with another program.
By changing proxy_worker_stat * to a void * and arranging the
corresponding code the first step to store the shared
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
So it makes sense from my perspective to
add a void pointer *to* the proxy_worker_stat structure to enable
balancers to store custom data that is private to them.
This already exists. See
void*context; /* general purpose storage */
--
On 09.07.2006 16:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
So it makes sense from my perspective to
add a void pointer *to* the proxy_worker_stat structure to enable
balancers to store custom data that is private to them.
This already exists. See
void*context;
