William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Well here's the patch... enjoy
+1
At 09:00 PM 11/20/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>>We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our
>>ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes.
>
>sounds good
>
>>We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and
>>configured for, and the attached pa
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our
ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes.
sounds good
We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and
configured for, and the attached patch to the Apache MPMs
presumes that this was the intent
We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our
ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes.
However, this turned out to be a nontrival problem. It doesn't appear
that this option was ever a tunable APR option.
We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and
configured for