Re: [PATCH] NO_USE_SIGACTION - no use undecorated names

2003-11-21 Thread Jeff Trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Well here's the patch... enjoy +1

Re: [PATCH] NO_USE_SIGACTION - no use undecorated names

2003-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 09:00 PM 11/20/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >>We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our >>ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes. > >sounds good > >>We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and >>configured for, and the attached pa

Re: [PATCH] NO_USE_SIGACTION - no use undecorated names

2003-11-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes. sounds good We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and configured for, and the attached patch to the Apache MPMs presumes that this was the intent

[PATCH] NO_USE_SIGACTION - no use undecorated names

2003-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes. However, this turned out to be a nontrival problem. It doesn't appear that this option was ever a tunable APR option. We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and configured for