Joe Orton wrote:
Found by the Coverity report, this one looks like a real bug:
check_provider_list has a if() branch to handle the passed-in
current_provider being NULL, but never sets it to anything else;
current_provider is later dereferenced unconditionally.
It looks like the
On 3/9/2006 at 4:49:24 am, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Max Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Found by the Coverity report, this one looks like a real bug:
check_provider_list has a if() branch to handle the passed-in
current_provider being NULL, but never sets it to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Orton wrote:
Found by the Coverity report, this one looks like a real bug:
check_provider_list has a if() branch to handle the passed-in
current_provider being NULL, but never sets it to anything else;
current_provider is later
{ On 3/9/2006 at 10:15:33 am, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Max
Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(((
since the access control directives 'Allow/Deny' have been folded in
as
providers.
)))
^^^ This bit isn't true.
What do you mean? The actual directives are only supported in trunk
through
On 3/9/06, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean? The actual directives are only supported in trunk
through the compatibility module mod_access_compat. This module as well
BTW, can we consider dropping the warning about the deprecated authz
directives in mod_access_compat to
On 3/9/2006 at 10:37:53 am, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/9/06, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean? The actual directives are only supported in
trunk
through the compatibility module mod_access_compat. This module as
well
BTW, can we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad Nicholes wrote:
{ On 3/9/2006 at 10:15:33 am, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Max
Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(((
since the access control directives 'Allow/Deny' have been folded in
as
providers.
)))
^^^ This bit isn't true.
