Re: [PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all just following up on this to see if the interested parties have given the issue any more thought. if there is still some dis-harmony around the IfDefine case then I'm happy to keep posting alternatives until a solution is reached that everyone can live with. otherwise, if there isn't

Re: [PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-10 Thread Geoffrey Young
Now you have me thinking. For Apache 2.1 (perhaps 2.0) I'd like to see that particular nonsense go away. I sympathize with André's observation that it's useful, but what he wants to do can be accomplished with IfDefine NEVER DangerousDirective /IfDefine which serves the same purpose, but

Re: [PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
Geoffrey Young wrote: André Malo wrote: * Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyway, attached is a patch that makes IfModule, IfDefine, I'd like to keep IfDefine possible. Simply because it's a very efficient way to comment a whole part out (reliably, since one cannot specify an

Re: [PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 09:36 AM 12/9/2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: André Malo wrote: I'd like to keep IfDefine possible. Simply because it's a very efficient way to comment a whole part out (reliably, since one cannot specify an empty -D argument). And it's in use out there. ok, here is a new patch that excludes

Re: [PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 09:36 AM 12/9/2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: André Malo wrote: I'd like to keep IfDefine possible. Simply because it's a very efficient way to comment a whole part out (reliably, since one cannot specify an empty -D argument). And it's in use out there. ok, here

[PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all... currently, all core container directives have an issue (albeit a minor one) - they require an argument in practice but are allowed to proceed without one during configuration. for example IfModule does not currently throw an error. instead, the config is allowed to proceed, soaking

Re: [PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-08 Thread Andr Malo
* Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyway, attached is a patch that makes IfModule, IfDefine, I'd like to keep IfDefine possible. Simply because it's a very efficient way to comment a whole part out (reliably, since one cannot specify an empty -D argument). And it's in use out there.

Re: [PATCH] catching malformed container directives

2003-12-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
André Malo wrote: * Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyway, attached is a patch that makes IfModule, IfDefine, I'd like to keep IfDefine possible. Simply because it's a very efficient way to comment a whole part out (reliably, since one cannot specify an empty -D argument).