Paul Querna wrote:
My basic question for the list is, are we better off modifying
the Worker MPM, or should we create a new 'event' MPM for now?
My $.02 worht:
Make an event MPM that is experimental. That way people can use tried
and true worker, or try the fancy new event one.
--
Brian
Greg Ames wrote:
Bill Stoddard created an event driven socket I/O patch a couple of
years ago that could serve pages. I picked it up and decided to see
if I could simplify it to minimize the changes to request processing.
What's the status of this? I'd be willing to help if needed. We are
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 08:18 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Greg Ames wrote:
Bill Stoddard created an event driven socket I/O patch a couple of
years ago that could serve pages. I picked it up and decided to see
if I could simplify it to minimize the changes to request processing.
What's the
I'm interested to know how httpd 2.x can be made more scalable. Could we serve
10,000 clients with current platforms as discussed at
http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html , without massive code churn and module breakage?
I believe that reducing the number of active threads would help by reducing
the
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Greg Ames wrote:
There are sites/workloads where keepalive timeouts tie up the majority of the
active threads or processes, such as our own web site as seen at
http://apache.org/server-status . I also see a lot of Ks when running
specweb99 on a stock httpd. Since we are
Paul Querna wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 10:23 -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
Here is the patch - http://apache.org/~gregames/event.patch .
Very Neat :D
thanks!
I don't think everyone on this list is aware of this, but I have an
outstanding patch[1] for apr_pollset to add both KQueue and sys_epoll
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:23:56AM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
I'm interested to know how httpd 2.x can be made more scalable. Could we
serve
10,000 clients with current platforms as discussed at
http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html , without massive code churn and module
breakage?
I've served over
