Re: [Slightly OT] Re: httpd x64 windows binaries

2007-06-19 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
I've update my page: http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries Would this be sufficient?

[Slightly OT] Re: httpd x64 windows binaries

2007-06-18 Thread Issac Goldstand
You know, I often think of offering this from my own consulting company; but I often wonder what exactly it entails... It worries me that I'd be inviting myself to get sued for a bug that already e4xists in Apache, whether or not I'm able to get it subsequently fit. Would it be asking too much

Re: [Slightly OT] Re: httpd x64 windows binaries

2007-06-18 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote: One major issue is; http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/459847/100/0/threaded where MS's response was entirely unsatisfactory w.r.t. POSIX compliance. Does MS ever follow standards? I know most

Re: [Slightly OT] Re: httpd x64 windows binaries

2007-06-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Issac Goldstand wrote: You know, I often think of offering this from my own consulting company; but I often wonder what exactly it entails... It worries me that I'd be inviting myself to get sued for a bug that already e4xists in Apache, whether or not I'm able to get it subsequently fit.