RE: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-06 Thread Bill Stoddard
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:26:22PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: aaa rewrite belongs in: 2.0: rbb, brianp, dreid, gstein, jim, rederpj, striker, trawick, ianh, gs, bnicholes 2.1: dpejesh, chris, aaron, hb If someone would like to do a release before I check in the aaa

[TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
aaa rewrite belongs in: 2.0: rbb, brianp, dreid, gstein, jim, rederpj, striker, trawick, ianh, gs, bnicholes 2.1: dpejesh, chris, aaron, hb If someone would like to do a release before I check in the aaa changes, I'd be game to hold off until Monday or Tuesday. (I don't have the time to

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:26:22PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: aaa rewrite belongs in: 2.0: rbb, brianp, dreid, gstein, jim, rederpj, striker, trawick, ianh, gs, bnicholes 2.1: dpejesh, chris, aaron, hb If someone would like to do a release before I check in the aaa changes,

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Marc Slemko
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:26:22PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: aaa rewrite belongs in: 2.0: rbb, brianp, dreid, gstein, jim, rederpj, striker, trawick, ianh, gs, bnicholes 2.1: dpejesh, chris, aaron, hb If someone would like to do

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Chris Taylor
] aaa rewrite On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:26:22PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: aaa rewrite belongs in: 2.0: rbb, brianp, dreid, gstein, jim, rederpj, striker, trawick, ianh, gs, bnicholes 2.1: dpejesh, chris, aaron, hb If someone would like to do a release before I check

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:41:38PM -0700, Marc Slemko wrote: The argument would be that they would never be stabilized until they are in HEAD since few people will use them until then. And my counter argument is that it doesn't really matter if nobody uses it until it makes it into HEAD. This

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:51:56PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: ... We can make a branch for a security release after the fact, either off the last release or off the pre-auth-change tag and then build a security-fix-only release off that branch. Why would we branch for a security fix in

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:26:22PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: aaa rewrite belongs in: 2.0: rbb, brianp, dreid, gstein, jim, rederpj, striker, trawick, ianh, gs, bnicholes 2.1: dpejesh, chris, aaron, hb If someone would like to do a release before I check in the aaa changes,

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:22:49PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: I'll try to get the release done over the weekend. Hell... at least a tag. Given a tag, then you can do whatever the heck you want. This is fair as long as it doesn't unreasonably disrupt anyelse's ability to work on whatever they

Re: [TALLY] aaa rewrite

2002-09-05 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:21:34PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: Quite simple, actually. You put the developers in definite pain by making them branch, compared to a *potential* pain of a branch for a security fix. pain being arguable, of course -- it all depends upon people's aversion to CVS