Which post?? The only thing on this thread is something about
mod_rewrite and SSL.
On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:33 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
I found the post... IMO, this should not hold off the release
at this point...
On Nov 15, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Which post?? The only thing on this thread is something about
mod_rewrite and SSL.
On 11/15/2011 11:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I found the post... IMO, this should not hold off the release
at this point...
It's beta, they get to keep all the pieces :)
But it suggests the ap_pregsub fix is not ready for 2.2-stable,
not until this is rooted out.
On 11/9/2011 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
or
On 11/11/2011 13:28, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Are the build problems on Windows a blocker?
I think we verbally agreed that they weren't, so unless someone vetoes
that statement on-list, we're good to go.
Having said that, it's still on my personal to-do list (eventually)
Issac
it a
try.
Steffen
-Original Message-
From: Steffen
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 4:26 PM Newsgroups:
gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.15-beta as beta
Building fine on Windows, except mod_lua is complaining that it cannot fine
The vote is CLOSED and passes with many more than 3 +1
(binding) votes…
Thx to all…
I will start the move to release during the day with
hopes that we can announce tomorrow (Monday)!!
w00t!
On Nov 9, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available
:
gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release 2.3.15-beta as beta
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next
+1 for beta on AIX/PPC64/xlc -- httpd.conf had all mods commented but
after correcting test suite ran clean after removal of ap_expr
recursive test.
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
or
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these
Stefan,
Which build problem? mod_lua?, I've never seen release blocked on a a
alpha/beta nor do I remember screaming and blocking a release by a
simple problem with a module, libhttpd is a whole different matter, as
that means nothing builds, therefore nothing works. mod_watchdog still
On 11/9/2011 6:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
or less will be 2.4.0 GA!!
Vote will last the normal 72 hours...
+1 for beta
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Stefan,
Which build problem? mod_lua?, I've never seen release blocked on a a
Yes, I meant the missing include path.
alpha/beta nor do I remember screaming and blocking a release by a simple
problem with a module, libhttpd is a whole different
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
or less will be 2.4.0 GA!!
Vote will last the
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key expired last Friday?
% gpg --verify ../incoming/httpd/trunk/2.3.15/httpd-2.3.15-beta.tar.gz.asc
gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
gpg: Signature made November 9, 2011 3:20:26 PM CET using RSA
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key expired last Friday?
Oups, was so convinced it is new, that I didn't see it already expired a
year ago. Maybe you should sign 2.4.0 with a new one?
Rainer
% gpg --verify
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key expired last Friday?
Oups, was so convinced it is new, that I didn't see it
Bring it (the key) tonight :)
On 09/11/2011 11:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key
Already sent to ST yesterday…
On Nov 9, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Bring it (the key) tonight :)
On 09/11/2011 11:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer
On 09.11.2011 11:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
Sorry for the noise, false alarm :(
Regards,
Rainer
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and
Am 09.11.2011 15:24, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
I believe Eric added some SSL stuff to mod_lua, and this now causes at 1st
glance that it doesnt compile at least for NetWare, and most likely also not
for Windows (static makefiles need to be fixed); but in addition I think we
need to make this SSL stuff optional so that its possible to build
Am 10.11.2011 00:09, schrieb Eric Covener:
I believe Eric added some SSL stuff to mod_lua, and this now causes at 1st
glance that it doesnt compile at least for NetWare, and most likely also not
for Windows (static makefiles need to be fixed); but in addition I think we
need to make this SSL
Am 10.11.2011 00:11, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
I didnt yet look self closer at it - just got the problem reported ...
so I guess mod_lua doesnt use OpenSSL functions, and therefore doesnt
link against OpenSSL, and loads runs still fine without mod_ssl loaded?
ok, adding include path seems to be
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Test Summary Report
---
t/modules/cgi.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 53 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 58 tests but ran 53.
t/modules/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 15 Failed: 2)
Failed
27 matches
Mail list logo
