* William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I checked at
least back until 2.0.
Could we check that the proposed patch works and that everyone is
OK w/ the implementation as well as maintaining the behavior.
My hope would be to TR 2.4.16 the end of this week :)
Some tests added for framework in r1686886.
These cover:
Redirect 403 /forbidden
RedirectMatch 403 /f+
Location /path/to/f+
Redirect 403
/Location
and should address the 2.4.13-15 regression.
I also changed the minimum version activating the expr tests
(Graham's), from 2.5 to 2.4.15.
On Mon,
A sort of unusual case though, first fix is a docs patch, then a test case
for the newly-documented 16 year old behavior :) +1 to the collected
feedback and plan.
On Jun 22, 2015 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Agreed. We should also, everytime we catch something like this,
add a
You are correct, however the syntax never illustrated this.
It seems we need two syntaxes, not a [target] optional argument.
On Jun 22, 2015 2:02 PM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 22. Juni 2015 01:08
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
@Yann: Wouldn't it make sense to check for cmd-path as well before we do
the expression parsing stuff to ensure we are really in a Location...
section?
OK...
+1:
o OSX 10.10.3, Xcode 6.3.2: x86_64
o FreeBSD 9.4, 10.1: x86_64
o CentOS 6.6, 7: x86_64
On Jun 19, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
Seems that 3rd time was NOT the charm.
Due to the regression I am canceling this VOTE.
Let's patch 2.4.16-dev ASAP to handle this and I will TR 2.4.16
forthwith.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Seems that 3rd time was NOT the charm.
Due to the regression I am canceling this VOTE.
Let's patch 2.4.16-dev ASAP to handle this and I will TR 2.4.16
forthwith.
Thanks, Jim! We'll get through this eventually :)
(And
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
The attached patch enables expressions for Location context only a
redirect status.
*and* a redirect status.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 22. Juni 2015 01:08
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.15 as GA
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I checked at
least back until 2.0.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_alias.html#redirect clearly
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-1 from me as well on the release. Looks like we are a little bit out of luck
with 2.4.x releases recently :-).
I'll show some uncharacteristic optimism -- in a way we have been very
lucky to
Am 22.06.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
mailto:j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Seems that 3rd time was NOT the charm.
Due to the regression I am canceling this VOTE.
Let's patch 2.4.16-dev ASAP to handle this and I will
Agreed. We should also, everytime we catch something like this,
add a test-case to the perl test framework to ensure we don't trip
over it again :)
On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Am 22.06.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at
in fact RedirectMatch is *completly* broken
RedirectMatch 404 ^\/something\/$
and *any* URI get a 404 response not just with the long list from my
previous post
Am 21.06.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Reindl Harald:
-1
just rebuilt my httpd rpm with the
-1
just rebuilt my httpd rpm with the
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.4.15.tar.bz2 on my testserver
and all vhosts are coming with a 404 page and nothing in the errorlog
first i thought it's a https problem cause by a self signed wildcard
certificate, but the same after remove the
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
On 6/19/2015 9:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
VC9/12 and various Windows flavors.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
No regression, with event and worker, included apr-1.5.2 and apr-util-1.5.4.
Tested systems:
* Debian 8 - 64bit,
* Debian 7 - 64bit,
*
On 6/21/2015 11:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
As this is not a regression from 2.4.13 or 2.4.14 candidates, it seems to
me we should ship.
I am mostly a lurker on this list but I feel I need to chime in on this.
The mistake with that sentiment is that it is imposing largely invisible to
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
And [1] broke your configuration, assuming ^\/something\/$ is an
expression (not a regex).
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1663259
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
As this is not a regression from 2.4.13 or 2.4.14 candidates, it seems to me
we should ship.
I am -1 for 2.4.15 with the regression. The other candidates being
broken doesn't mitigate it much for me.
--
Eric
Reindl,
Try reverting http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1663259
and see if this resolves your observed defect.
On Jun 21, 2015 12:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
in fact RedirectMatch is *completly* broken
RedirectMatch 404 ^\/something\/$
and *any* URI
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:02 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
And [1] broke your configuration, assuming ^\/something\/$ is an
expression (not a regex).
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1663259
that may be true but
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1663259 and see if
this resolves your observed defect.
could you provide a unified
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1663259 and see if
this resolves your observed
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:02 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
All the way back to 1.3... the fact that it worked at all was a
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1663259 and see if
this resolves your observed defect.
could you provide a unified diff for inclusion in the RPM-SPEC for
revert that commit, i can't build outside
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Pulling Coar/Bowen '04 Apache Cookbook off the shelf, this error was
propagated by the last example in 5.8 (and likely elsewhere);
Redirect gone /foo.html
which likely isn't working in 2.4.15.
It is (still)
No issues/regressions seen with VC9/10/11/14 running XP/win7/win8+/win10 and
server 2012+/2016.
Op 21 jun. 2015 om 19:30 heeft Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net het volgende
geschreven:
On 6/19/2015 9:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
Am 21.06.2015 um 22:05 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe
On 20/06/2015 02:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
using included apr 1.5.2 and apr-util 1.5.4 and with mysql (mariadb)
+1 Slackware 13.1 - 14.1
PS: Hopefully, 3rd time's the charm!
:)
On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ]
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
[ ] +1: Good to go
+1 AIX/xlc/PPC64 100% pass
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72
39 matches
Mail list logo
