Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-23 Thread Glenn Strauss
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:06:02PM +, Matthieu Estrade wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're fresh. Please start testing these releases - they should have the intent of becoming the beginning of the 2.2.x series

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-22 Thread Matthieu Estrade
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're fresh. Please start testing these releases - they should have the intent of becoming the beginning of the 2.2.x series modulo all of the cleanup work we'll have to do after we branch. For now,

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-20 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 1:49 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Back up. Nothing is a release, not even an alpha, without 3 +1's. Until it's voted as a release, even as alpha, it's simply a tarball. Nobody can declare any release without 3 +1's and it's been that

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-20 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 2:35 AM -0500 Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Consensus at the conference was that the branch point corresponds to the 2.1.x release upon which we declare feature freeze for the 2.2 branch. My concern with this is that if we're waiting for one small

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-20 Thread Brad Nicholes
Since this is alpha level, should the server signature contain -alpha so that users don't get this confused with an actual release? Once I build binaries for NetWare, the only thing that will indicate that this is an alpha is the name of the .zip file. It would be less confusing if the

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-20 Thread Brad Nicholes
The netware build is not copying the charset.conv file to the /conf directory during the make install stage. I just committed a patch for NWgnumakefile. Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, November 19, 2004 11:14:19 PM http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're

2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're fresh. Please start testing these releases - they should have the intent of becoming the beginning of the 2.2.x series modulo all of the cleanup work we'll have to do after we branch. For now, 2.1.1 includes APR/APR-util

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-19 Thread Paul Querna
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're fresh. Please start testing these releases - they should have the intent of becoming the beginning of the 2.2.x series modulo all of the cleanup work we'll have to do after we branch. For now,

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:14 AM 11/20/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're fresh. Please start testing these releases - they should have the intent of becoming the beginning of the 2.2.x series modulo all of the cleanup work we'll have to do after

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 12:53 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.1.1 is nothing (yet) 3 +1's (more +1 than -1) becomes alpha release. 3 +1's (more +1 than -1) alpha becomes beta. That beta becomes a perfect branch point for 2.2 GA. Not quite. It's alpha now.

Re: 2.1.1 tarballs posted...

2004-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:22 AM 11/20/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Saturday, November 20, 2004 12:53 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alpha indicates that the release is not meant for mainstream usage or may have serious problems that prohibits its use. When a release is initially