Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
Let's
to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
Let's get people excited again about Apache httpd!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
i would happily build a RPM for our devel-machines
still missing a RC tarball :-(
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Jim is referring to votes in the STATUS file
DirectoryCheckHandler has got my vote/promotion.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's
Am 03.03.2014 15:44, schrieb Eric Covener:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
i would happily build a RPM for our devel-machines
still missing a RC tarball :-(
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2
On 22.02.2014 18:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
I updated aurora our US server for www.apache.org, the project sites and
also mail-archives.a.o to 2.4.8 dev svn revision 1570851 plus apr/apu
head revision of
On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
I updated aurora our US server for www.apache.org, the project sites and
also mail-archives.a.o to 2.4.8 dev svn revision 1570851 plus apr/apu
head revision of their 1.5 branches. Looks good, but only
2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
Let's get people excited again about Apache httpd!
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:50 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no embedded. httpd-2.2 included apr, apr-util. httpd-2.4 by
vote of the PMC excluded apr, apr-util, so you might be imagining
Sorry, sloppy terminology: I built httpd with apr and apr-util inside
its tree,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:50 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no embedded. httpd-2.2 included apr, apr-util. httpd-2.4 by
vote of the PMC excluded apr, apr-util, so you might be imagining
Output from ldd /user/local/bin/httpd ?
mod_ssl and aprutil-1.so aught to have the right rpath to resolve. One of
your other libs is bound to openssl, as I warned you before about
libldap/lber.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
Output from ldd /user/local/bin/httpd ?
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb77a9000)
libpcre.so.1 = /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0xb7782000)
libaprutil-1.so.0 = /usr/local/apache2/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0 (0xb775c000)
libexpat.so.1 =
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Output from ldd /user/local/bin/httpd ?
My system is up and running and serving https using the system openssl library.
I would like to use
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
Let's
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
I hope
On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
I configured httpd-2.4.7 successfully to use mod_ssl:
...
That could be user error. The path /usr/local/ssl/fips-2.0 is the default
install location of the FIPS
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
I configured httpd-2.4.7 successfully to use mod_ssl:
...
That could be user error.
On 19/02/2014 23:54, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
I configured httpd-2.4.7 successfully to use
Tom, please start a new thread, this is a discuss thread for planning a
2.4.8 release. Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 19/02/2014 23:54, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 20/02/2014 00:24, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 19/02/2014 23:54, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen
Odd, there is something going on here. I am wondering if this fails to
resolve zlib libraries? Also don't concern yourself with the 0.9.7 check,
you met it (=) with 1.0.1. Somehow, it didn't resolve the ssl library
files initially given
adding -L/usr/local/ssl/lib to LDFLAGS
setting LIBS to
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
Odd, there is something going on here. I am wondering if this fails to
I'm sorry for muddying the water.
I originally used the option 'zlib' for configuring openssl-fips and
open ssl. I'm in the process of rebuilding
No, it isn't muddying things, this should just work. So you are building
your own openssl. Are you certain your build of ssl and build of httpd and
apr are using the same 32 or 64 bit memory model? That's one obvious
reason where ld will fail. And the zlib, expat and pcre you resolve to
must
On 20/02/2014 00:24, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
..
checking for OpenSSL version = 0.9.7... OK
Well something is wrong there with it indicating OpenSSL version 0.9.7. If
you
intend to use the FIPS 2.0 module
I've noticed that openssl default builds do not necessarily add -lz to the
lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc when they might be needed. In any case I'm going
to guess you perhaps hadn't installed the zlib1g-dev package?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that openssl default builds do not necessarily add -lz to the
lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc when they might be needed. In any case I'm going
to guess you perhaps hadn't installed the zlib1g-dev package?
No,
You could try tweaking the deployed /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc
file to include -lz in Libs: (just after -ldl), and then re-./configure
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
You could try tweaking the deployed /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc file
to include -lz in Libs: (just after -ldl), and then re-./configure
I'll first see if I can get a good SSL to work. So far no build
problems
On 20/02/2014 02:21, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
You could try tweaking the deployed /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc file
to include -lz in Libs: (just after -ldl), and then re-./configure
I'll first see if I can get a
First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
pkgconfig isn't consulted properly. httpd configure would also likely fail
for redundant symbols.
Second insight - apr-util version 1.5 includes
On 20/02/2014 02:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
pkgconfig
isn't consulted properly. httpd configure would also likely fail for
redundant
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 20/02/2014 02:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
No option which I think means static.
impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
pkgconfig isn't consulted
There is no embedded. httpd-2.2 included apr, apr-util. httpd-2.4 by
vote of the PMC excluded apr, apr-util, so you might be imagining
things. Or RM's are doing some goofy things.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM,
).
Bing
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:58 PM
To: httpd
Subject: 2.4.8 This Month
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test
And it's also important to keep Apache httpd-x64 code current with the new
Windows Server + Visual Studio versions, since that's the most cases I know
of around.
Is there a particular problem on that front? Contributions are welcome.
And it's also important to keep Apache httpd-x64 code current with the new
Windows Server + Visual Studio versions, since that's the most cases I
know
of around.
Let's not hijack the 2.4.8 TR thread for yet another round of this topic.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Eric Covener
I'd like to TR and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
Let's get people excited again about Apache httpd!
41 matches
Mail list logo
