-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
No regressions...
Now that this has been passed successfully, do you see need for
any further discussion / changes before I commit it or should
I commit to the trunk and we continue our further changes / discussions
there?
Regards
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
Von: Jim Jagielski=20
=20
No regressions...
=20
Now that this has been passed successfully, do you see need for
any further discussion / changes before I commit it or should
I commit to the trunk and we continue our further
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
I vote to commit and use that as the continue point for
more development :)
Excellent. I will do so tonight German time. Currently I am away from my
development env as you may have noticed from my nicely formated
Outlook mails :-).
I'll do it, no prob.
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski=20
=20
=20
I vote to commit and use that as the continue point for
more development :)
Excellent. I will do so tonight German time. Currently I am
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Although it's not really documented anyplace, it really is
good practice for people who submit large changes to run
That seems a reasonable good idea.
them through the
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
Currently I am away from my developing environment, but as soon
as I get there (tonight German time) I will sent an updated version.
Thanks in advance for running the tests.
Anytime! :)
I'm currently trying to trace through exactly how
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
I'm currently trying to trace through exactly how the code is
trying to pool connections. Of course, we're only using
reslist if we're a threaded MPM...
Really? I thought APR_HAS_THREADS is set when the OS supports threads.
I thought
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
I'm currently trying to trace through exactly how the code is=20
trying to pool connections. Of course, we're only using=20
reslist if we're a threaded MPM...
Really? I
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Yeah, but we check to see if we're 1 thread, so in prefork,
we drop to single connection workers.
Which makes sense to me. Why have more than one connection per worker
on a prefork processes that can only handle one request at a
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski=20
=20
=20
Yeah, but we check to see if we're 1 thread, so in prefork,
we drop to single connection workers.
Which makes sense to me.
To me too. What it's doing is
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm currently trying to trace through exactly how the code is trying
to pool connections.
If someone produces a good patch, I have some traffic I can throw at it :)
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
11 matches
Mail list logo