AW: lb_score

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Off the top of my head, I have no idea why we even have lb_score rather than just using proxy_worker_stat as we should. This is easy to fix except for the fact that ap_get_scoreboard_lb() is AP_DECLARE... Of course, adjusting in

Re: AW: lb_score

Von: Jim Jagielski=20 =20 =20 Off the top of my head, I have no idea why we even have lb_score rather than just using proxy_worker_stat as we should. This is easy to fix except for the fact that ap_get_scoreboard_lb() is AP_DECLARE... Of course, adjusting in HEAD is fine, but this is

AW: lb_score

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski That was the reason I added the 'context' struct member, to allow for some reasonable extensions without adjusting the actual API. :) Yes, but it is not possible to share this data over processes easily as it is only a pointer.

Re: AW: lb_score

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote: -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski=20 =20 =20 That was the reason I added the 'context' struct member, to=20 allow for some reasonable extensions without adjusting the=20 actual API. :) Yes, but it is not

AW: AW: lb_score

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Yes, but it is not possible to share this data over processes easily as it is only a pointer. But it could be a pointer to a shared memory segment :) Yes of course, but I have to write more code to manage this than for an

Re: AW: AW: lb_score

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote: -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski=20 =20 Yes, but it is not possible to share this data over=20 processes easily=20 as it is only a pointer. =20 But it could be a pointer to a shared memory segment :)