Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Still semi-broken if trying the simple MPM due to both mod_unixd and unixd being built: I presume this isn't about simple mpm - that mod_unixd is going to be modularized for all unix mpm's? Yeppers... that

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-30 Thread Tim Bray
On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Nick Kew wrote: When svn up breaks a source file, at least you get a meaningful error message pointing to exactly what needs fixing. This m4 is nasty! If /usr/bin/m4 were by arbitrary fiat deleted from all unix-like systems world-wide, there would be

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Tim Bray wrote: On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Nick Kew wrote: When svn up breaks a source file, at least you get a meaningful error message pointing to exactly what needs fixing. This m4 is nasty! If /usr/bin/m4 were by arbitrary fiat deleted from all unix-like

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-30 Thread Paul Querna
Tim Bray wrote: On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Nick Kew wrote: When svn up breaks a source file, at least you get a meaningful error message pointing to exactly what needs fixing. This m4 is nasty! If /usr/bin/m4 were by arbitrary fiat deleted from all unix-like systems world-wide, there

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-30 Thread Paul Querna
Jim Jagielski wrote: On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Tim Bray wrote: On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Nick Kew wrote: When svn up breaks a source file, at least you get a meaningful error message pointing to exactly what needs fixing. This m4 is nasty! If /usr/bin/m4 were by arbitrary fiat

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 30, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Tim Bray wrote: On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Nick Kew wrote: When svn up breaks a source file, at least you get a meaningful error message pointing to exactly what needs fixing. This m4 is

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Jagielski wrote: Still semi-broken if trying the simple MPM due to both mod_unixd and unixd being built: I presume this isn't about simple mpm - that mod_unixd is going to be modularized for all unix mpm's?

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-30 Thread Nick Kew
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Still semi-broken if trying the simple MPM due to both mod_unixd and unixd being built: I presume this isn't about simple mpm - that mod_unixd is going to be modularized for all unix mpm's? That's the idea, yes. Plus a decision over whether

Broken trunk build

2008-10-29 Thread Nick Kew
I've just tried a clean trunk build, to play with Paul's simple MPM. Unfortunately buildconf fails around autoheader and autoconf: rebuilding include/ap_config_auto.h.in NONE:0: m4: ERROR: EOF in string autom4te: m4 failed with exit status: 1 autoheader: autom4te failed with exit status: 1

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-29 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Nick Kew Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 12:18 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Broken trunk build I've just tried a clean trunk build, to play with Paul's simple MPM. Unfortunately buildconf fails around

Re: Broken trunk build

2008-10-29 Thread Tony Stevenson
Nick Kew wrote: Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: [SNIP] ... This m4 is nasty! +1 on that