RE: Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2006/10/08]

2006-10-11 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Guy Hulbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:33 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2006/10/08] ... IMHO that's supremely unimportant. I just delete these messages Hmmm ... me too. Do

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2006/10/08]

2006-10-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

RE: Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2006/10/08]

2006-10-09 Thread Boyle Owen
Hi all, Speaking as an apache user (not developer) who merely lurks on this list, is it appropriate for me to question the formatting (and hence usefulness) of this periodic report? If so; - Might the time-ordering be reversed to show the most recent, first? It seems a bit odd always to find,

Re: Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2006/10/08]

2006-10-09 Thread Nick Kew
On Monday 09 October 2006 07:53, Boyle Owen wrote: Hi all, Speaking as an apache user (not developer) who merely lurks on this list, is it appropriate for me to question the formatting (and hence usefulness) of this periodic report? By all means. You've earned karma on the users@ list, but

Re: Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2006/10/08]

2006-10-09 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Mon, 2006-09-10 at 09:24 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: On Monday 09 October 2006 07:53, Boyle Owen wrote: Hi all, Speaking as an apache user (not developer) who merely lurks on this list, is it appropriate for me to question the formatting (and hence usefulness) of this periodic report?