On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 10:41:38AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would like to publicly THANK Sander and Justin for their
tireless (well, not literally tireless, because they worked
so long that they were *very* tired) work in doing the
conversion!
I think during AC2004 everyone settled
Hi again,
The actual load seems to be working now (save the documentation...).
Given that this wasn't a smooth ride, we've loaded things in the
test repository. Please take a look at it:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/
If noone raises any issues we'll load it in the main repository
On Nov 17, 2004, at 4:45 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi again,
The actual load seems to be working now (save the documentation...).
Given that this wasn't a smooth ride, we've loaded things in the
test repository. Please take a look at it:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/
If noone raises
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to publicly THANK Sander and Justin for their
tireless (well, not literally tireless, because they worked
so long that they were *very* tired) work in doing the
conversion!
I think during AC2004 everyone settled their beer scores,
but
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
The actual load seems to be working now (save the documentation...).
Given that this wasn't a smooth ride, we've loaded things in the
test repository. Please take a look at it:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/
If noone
--On Friday, November 19, 2004 7:57 PM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looks basically fine. I'm wondering a bit about the tags directory,
especially the 1.3 subdir. Is it necessary, is there something broken?
Just to be clear, Sander's email that you are replying to was an artifact
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:04, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, November 19, 2004 7:57 PM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looks basically fine. I'm wondering a bit about the tags directory,
especially the 1.3 subdir. Is it necessary, is there something broken?
Just to be
