Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:49:50 +0100
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Thanks for your reply. That was really the thing I need to hear.
Hi,
the item Mass vhosting version of suEXEC has been on the wish list
in httpd's STATUS file for many years. However it is not easy to do
without
Hi,
the item Mass vhosting version of suEXEC has been on the wish list
in httpd's STATUS file for many years. However it is not easy to do
without introducing local privilege escalation vulnerabilties.
On Tuesday 22 February 2011, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Some days ago I found that I'm
Hello there.
Some days ago I found that I'm tired of original suexec which is
shipped with apache.
I have two issues:
1.I'd like to configure it with config file, not with rebuilding,
because I use modern OS with package system and don't want to depend on
self-compiled components.
2.I'd like to
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:04 +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
because I use modern OS with package system and don't want to depend on
Now there's a contradiction.
2.I'd like to use apache2+fcgid+suexec+php5. But with original suexec I
apache2 ?? whats that sarcasm? it is called
Hello, Noel.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:27:42 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:04 +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
because I use modern OS with package system and don't want to
depend on
Now there's a contradiction.
No it is not. You just need
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 02:46 +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Hello, Noel.
If you have seen apache2 it is only because debian (and its clones) call
it that, I've seen an apache tree call it that yet.
But, thats a pretty typical response from a debian troll, debian is
right and everyone
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:55 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
If you have seen apache2 it is only because debian (and its clones)
call it that, I've seen an apache tree call it that yet.
Correction, I've *never* seen...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
