On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some
Unix-ish platforms.
I haven't seen any other complaints (yet), so I'm in no big hurry to
get out another release. I'll wait until we have a handful of
solutions
Jeff:
I haven't seen any other complaints (yet), so I'm in no big hurry to
get out another release. I'll wait until we have a handful of
solutions ready for real end-user problems, unless we see that this
issue is affecting a number of people.
OK, great. I'll try to move on to my next
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.com wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some
Unix-ish platforms.
OK, I have a first cut at what I'm hoping to commit shortly, unless
anyone sees problems. Let me know if you
Jeff:
Go ahead with the fix; I'll review in detail and test it once you
commit your final version.
OK, I'll test more today first. Thanks.
BTW, I haven't seen (or recognized) a commit to allow both a FastCGI
authorizer and a FastCGI handler for the same request. Have I missed
something
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some
Unix-ish platforms.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some
Unix-ish platforms.
OK, noted. I very much hope to pack in some additional changes
to the wrapper management code this week; time's still on my side
at the moment. I spent some of Friday on it but what
Jeff Trawick wrote:
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some
Unix-ish platforms.
OK, I have a first cut at what I'm hoping to commit shortly, unless
anyone sees problems. Let me know if you want me to hold off until
you've cut another GA; otherwise I'll continue
