On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:43:00AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I have run into this one also and I still don't understand why the
make is all of the sudden asking for yacc when this all worked
before. Since neither mod_ssl nor BSD sockets are part of the
standard NetWare
At 11:25 AM 6/16/2005, Greg Marr wrote:
At 12:01 PM 6/16/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Back to httpd land; the question is --- is this the right choice for *our
tarballs*? Which may or may not be related to the question above. In any
case; this is useful metadata even for end users who
At 10:42 AM 6/17/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Checkout date/time is generally the right choice for developers,
because otherwise make doesn't always pick up when a file has
changed. (I've been bit by the Visual SourceSafe modification
time default enough times.)
Although - heh - you
Greetings All,
Trying to build Apache 2.1 (head) for NetWare on a Win2K box and get the
following error:
Compiling ssl_expr.c
Compiling ssl_expr_eval.c
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), yacc ssl_expr_parse.y, ...) failed.
make (e=2): The system cannot find the file specified.
make[2]: ***
I have run into this one also and I still don't understand why the make is
all of the sudden asking for yacc when this all worked before. Since neither
mod_ssl nor BSD sockets are part of the standard NetWare build, this isn't a
show stopper. But I would like to understand what happened
At 09:43 AM 6/16/2005, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I have run into this one also and I still don't understand why the make is
all of the sudden asking for yacc when this all worked before. Since neither
mod_ssl nor BSD sockets are part of the standard NetWare build, this isn't a
show stopper.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:43 AM 6/16/2005, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I have run into this one also and I still don't understand why the make is
all of the sudden asking for yacc when this all worked before. Since neither
mod_ssl nor BSD sockets are part of the standard NetWare build,
At 09:59 AM 6/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
* The most recent tarballs have been pulled together with SVN's
absolutely bogus default of [miscellany] use-commit-times = no
(see your ~/.svn/config, where you can uncomment this section
and option).
Bill, I wish
Greetings All Good Morning from Au.
I'm currently using the SVN 1.2 TortoiseSVN client (upgraded a few days
ago), and noted the following dates in modules/ssl -
ssl_expr_parse.h 12/11/04
ssl_expr_parse.c 12/02/05
ssl_expr_parse.y 15/06/05
ssl_expr_scan.c5/02/05
ssl_expr_scan.l
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:59 AM 6/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
* The most recent tarballs have been pulled together with SVN's
absolutely bogus default of [miscellany] use-commit-times = no
(see your ~/.svn/config, where you can uncomment this section
10 matches
Mail list logo
