Re: Fixing apr_dbd_freetds (Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost)

2012-08-22 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Mikhail T. wrote: > Perhaps, this discussion should be happening on the ticket itself? Oh, well > :) Comments inline: and/or d...@apr.apache.org > > On 22.08.2012 10:47, Nick Kew wrote: > > I think I've pointed a few people at the ODBC driver as an alternative.

Fixing apr_dbd_freetds (Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost)

2012-08-22 Thread Mikhail T.
Perhaps, this discussion should be happening on theticket itself? Oh, well :) Comments inline: On 22.08.2012 10:47, Nick Kew wrote: I think I've pointed a few people at the ODBC driver as an alternative. Do you have a strong reason t

Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost

2012-08-22 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:21:16 -0400 "Mikhail T." wrote: > On 22.08.2012 07:24, Nick Kew wrote: > > The implementation needs object persistence, of the kind we have > > in the per-server configuration but not per-directory. That was the > > original design constraint. > I'd say, my complaint was a

Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost

2012-08-22 Thread Mikhail T.
On 22.08.2012 07:24, Nick Kew wrote: The implementation needs object persistence, of the kind we have in the per-server configuration but not per-directory. That was the original design constraint. I'd say, my complaint was a little misunderstood. It is not, that I wish to see separate DBD-conf

Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost

2012-08-22 Thread Igor Galić
> > My rusty memory tells me that someone submitted a patch to fix this > > a while ago? https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45456 Has someone had a chance to review/test it so far? > Now that you mention it, wasn't something committed? I think that > whatever we have is eit

Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost

2012-08-22 Thread Nick Kew
On 22 Aug 2012, at 11:43, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 22 Aug 2012, at 10:25 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > >>> From reading the module's documentation, it seems, a single vhost can only >>> use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single >>> DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, fo

Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost

2012-08-22 Thread Graham Leggett
On 22 Aug 2012, at 10:25 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >> From reading the module's documentation, it seems, a single vhost can only >> use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single >> DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, for example. > > That is by design: it is expected to meet

Re: Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost

2012-08-22 Thread Nick Kew
On 21 Aug 2012, at 20:27, Mikhail T. wrote: > From reading the module's documentation, it seems, a single vhost can only > use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single > DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, for example. That is by design: it is expected to meet most ne

Limitations of mod_dbd - single server per vhost

2012-08-21 Thread Mikhail T.
From reading the module's documentation , it seems, a single vhost can only use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, for example. Also, the syntax of mod_rewrite's dbd/fastdbd