Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-09-21 Thread Todd
I'm just looking for a fix to this problem. Granted that this is a security issue specifically in this case b/c the header turns out to be a Client Cert. I am not sure where the bug is, my guess is it's in mod-headers if that is the case, a plain HTTP header that is multi-line would be corrupted

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-09-18 Thread Todd
Hi 1. So whatever happened to this code? 2. Did this ever make it into Apache 2.0.44 and later? Thanks. --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maik Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Graham, Friday, February 14, 2003, 12:17:23 PM, you wrote: GL Looking at this further, the header value is

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-09-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:17 AM 2/14/2003, Graham Leggett wrote: Maik Mueller wrote: Putting arbitrary 8bit characters into headers makes me feel a bit uneasy but I couldn't find a quote that this is forbidden. Looking at this further, the header value is defined as TEXT. TEXT is defined as OCTETs that are not

RE: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-09-18 Thread Resume
please remove my address from this mailing list as I was never asked to be put on. Thank you -Original Message- From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-14 Thread Maik Mueller
Hello Graham, GL I overhauled mod_headers for Apache v2.0, so I am pretty confident it is GL a bug. I will look at it sometime this weekend. I agree with you that breaking multiple lines with CRLF and adding HT to the following line will fix the bug of potentially building illegal headers from

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-14 Thread Graham Leggett
Maik Mueller wrote: Putting arbitrary 8bit characters into headers makes me feel a bit uneasy but I couldn't find a quote that this is forbidden. Looking at this further, the header value is defined as TEXT. TEXT is defined as OCTETs that are not control characters. An OCTET is an 8 bit

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-14 Thread Maik Mueller
Hello Graham, Friday, February 14, 2003, 12:17:23 PM, you wrote: GL Looking at this further, the header value is defined as TEXT. TEXT is GL defined as OCTETs that are not control characters. An OCTET is an 8 bit GL character. As far as I can see it should be up to the entity putting GL data

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-13 Thread Maik Mueller
Hello Graham, Wednesday, February 12, 2003, 12:24:47 PM, you wrote: GL Maik Mueller wrote: 1. SSL_CLIENT_CERT produces multi-line output and the RequestHeader directive isn't able to transfer it into a correct multi-line HTTP header. GL As I understand it, headers may span multiple lines

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-13 Thread Maik Mueller
Hi Erik, Hi Maik, Just post it here or to the docs-list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as a unified diff patch (diff -u). But please be aware, that we are generating the whole documentation from XML source. Therefore you should patch these instead of the HTML files. Yes, I have already learned that. I

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-13 Thread Graham Leggett
Maik Mueller wrote: I don't consider the behavior of mod_headers as a bug. The point is that the content of the environment variable SSL_CLIENT_CERT isn't formatted according to the rules for folding headers onto multiple lines. The job of formatting the header onto multiple lines should be

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-13 Thread Maik Mueller
Graham Leggett wrote: Maik Mueller wrote: I don't consider the behaviour of mod_headers as a bug. The point is that the content of the environment variable SSL_CLIENT_CERT isn't formatted according to the rules for folding headers onto multiple lines. The job of formatting the header onto

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-13 Thread Graham Leggett
Maik Mueller wrote: I'm neither the author of mod_headers nor can I see a bug in the current behaviour. I overhauled mod_headers for Apache v2.0, so I am pretty confident it is a bug. I will look at it sometime this weekend. You have to do both in any case. The check itself causes the

Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-12 Thread Maik Mueller
Hello All, I want to provide updated information to my earlier described scenario using mod_ssl + mod_proxy + mod_headers: Component: Web Browser --- Proxy (mod_proxy) --- Web Server SSL Role: SSL Client --- SSL server | SSL Client --- SSL Server The following discussion

Re: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-12 Thread Graham Leggett
Maik Mueller wrote: 1. SSL_CLIENT_CERT produces multi-line output and the RequestHeader directive isn't able to transfer it into a correct multi-line HTTP header. As I understand it, headers may span multiple lines (correct me if I am wrong). Therefore if RequestHeader isn't able to handle

RE: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-12 Thread Maik Mueller
Cool.. Can you please post the patch to the list, so that ppl can review the code, and give their comments. -Madhu No problem! Here is my short README describing the patch and its history form Apache version 2.0.43 to 2.0.44: Hello! This is the distribution point for the Apache 2.0 as SSL

RE: Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-11 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Cool.. Can you please post the patch to the list, so that ppl can review the code, and give their comments. -Madhu -Original Message- From: Maik Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Patches and Enhancements for a SSL-Proxy Based on Apache 2.0 (mod_ssl, mod_proxy, mod_headers)

2003-02-11 Thread Maik Mueller
Hello All, I want to provide updated information to my earlier described scenario using mod_ssl + mod_proxy + mod_headers: Component: Web Browser --- Proxy (mod_proxy) --- Web Server SSL Role: SSL Client --- SSL server | SSL Client --- SSL Server The following discussion