Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-09-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Sunday 02 September 2001 01:22, Greg Stein wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:16:15PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Friday 31 August 2001 19:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: From: Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-09-04 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:15:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Sunday 02 September 2001 01:22, Greg Stein wrote: ... I use distclean on my computer all the time. Along with extraclean. Neither of those targets should toss config.nice. *That* is what I mean. To be clear: nothing in our

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-09-03 Thread Greg Stein
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:01:15PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Sunday 02 September 2001 10:28, Jim Winstead wrote: ... it may be worth following the gnu project's lead on these targets, since they use the same names. http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_55.html#SEC55 (for them,

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-09-02 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:16:15PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Friday 31 August 2001 19:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: From: Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: ... exports.c shouldn't be

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-09-02 Thread Jim Winstead
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:25:07PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Which means it has nothing to do with cleaning the tree to a distribution state (or state 'ready for distribution'.) See, I think that's the difference of interpretation here.

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-09-02 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Sunday 02 September 2001 10:28, Jim Winstead wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:25:07PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Which means it has nothing to do with cleaning the tree to a distribution state (or state 'ready for distribution'.)

RE: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Charles Randall
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We also don't remove build.mk because it is like a Makefile (which we don't seem to remove). Hmm. Am I the

RE: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Charles Randall wrote: From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We also don't remove build.mk because it is like a Makefile

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:38:39AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Friday 31 August 2001 10:31, Charles Randall wrote: From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:42, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Charles Randall wrote: From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We