On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 08:47 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote:
I'm all
for calling 2.11 a dud and restarting with 2.12
Version numbers are cheap - go for it.
--
Bojan
Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
creating mod_apreq2.la
(cd .libs rm -f mod_apreq2.la ln -s ../mod_apreq2.la mod_apreq2.la)
make:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
creating mod_apreq2.la
(cd .libs rm -f mod_apreq2.la ln -s
Randy Kobes wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet?
I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:
Steve Hay wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet?
I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:
http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2
This is
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 04:03 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Does the perl glue not being built / installed correctly on CentOS count ?
[I had spoken too soon before when I was all excited]
If there is a problem with libapreq2 RPMS on CentOS, let me know what
the fix is.
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 14:53 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I built from SVN or do you mean you'll add a patch to the rpm
after release ?
I thought you were referring to current RPM build/install there.
If there is a problem with build/install on CentOS from source and we
know how to fix
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 13:53 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
That is bunk. We shoul NEVER try to support svn builds for releases,
because that makes us dependent on whatever autocruft is on CentOS.
It also doesn't help diddly squat when testing a potential candidate
for release, since those are
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
Issac
Issac Goldstand wrote:
The apreq developers are planning a maintenance release of
libapreq2. This version addresses several bugfixes and includes new
features.
Changes since the last release
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet?
I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:
http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet?
I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:
On Wed 28 Jan 2009, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
If it matters, I have successfully run all tests on my mod_perl
installation (threading branch) with apache 2.2.11 both with worker and
prefork on Suse linux
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
On Wed 28 Jan 2009, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
If it matters, I have successfully run all tests on my mod_perl
installation (threading branch) with apache 2.2.11 both with worker and
Steve Hay wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet?
I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:
http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2
I must've
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:50 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote:
I don't get any fails by me... Can you try make test-ing apreq2-2.08
and see if you get the same fails so we know if it's a regression?
Will do.
--
Bojan
builds and tests ok on gentoo linux w/ apache 2.2.8, mod_perl 2.0.4
+1 for me (tested on debian).
- Original Message
From: Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net
To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: d...@httpd.apache.org; modp...@perl.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:48:30 AM
Subject: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11
The apreq
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Please give the tarball at
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq2-2.11.tar.gz
a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list
at apreq-...@httpd.apache.org.
I have a build error using VC++ 2005 on Win32 with perl-5.10.0,
apache-2.2.10,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Issac Goldstand wrote:
The apreq developers are planning a maintenance release of
libapreq2. This version addresses several bugfixes and includes new
features.
+1
Tested on httpd-2.2.10/perl5.6.10/mp-2.0.4 linux-32bit (debian sarge)
-BEGIN
+1 for me (tested on debian).
- Original Message
From: Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net
To: apreq-...@httpd.apache.org
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org; modp...@perl.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:48:30 AM
Subject: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11
The apreq
20 matches
Mail list logo
