On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> The question here is given this context, should AUTH_GENERAL_ERROR ==
> AUTH_USER_NOT_FOUND? Given this context, the answer is probably yes.
> However are there any cases dealing with authn_alias where the answer should
> be no?
To care
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Nicholes
> Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 16:58
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AuthBasicProvider failover and mod_authnz_ldap
> authn_alias where the answer should be no? The second issue
> is what should authnz_ldap
>>> On 7/13/2009 at 3:31 PM, in message
<1404e5910907131431m42ec4cffwc08caf273b71f...@mail.gmail.com>, Eric Covener
wrote:
> PR#47521 points out that when mod_authnz_ldap has some fatal LDAP
> connectivity error, it doesn't allow other AuthBasicProviders to have
> a shot at checking the userid.
>
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
> Haven't thought this through but from a first glance it makes sense that
> the next provider can continue if the first one had a fatal error.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Covener
> Sent: Montag, 13. Juli 2009 23:31
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: AuthBasicProvider failover and mod_authnz_ldap
>
> PR#47521 points out that when mod_authnz_ldap has some fatal LDAP
> connectivity error, it doesn't allow other AuthBas
