On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:43:10PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26076
[...]
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-13 07:18 -------
That's not a bug: a $DESTDIR installation is an intermediate install step. The
apxs in the $DESTDIR root would not be expected to work, since all its embedded
filenames will point into the real install --prefix. Complete the install and
apxs will work.
Should httpd's install process at least print a big warning when people use 'make install DESTDIR=/foo' different from --prefix. Why other projects should get bug reports on something that's an httpd/apxs issue? It installs apxs which knowingly won't work.
There is no issue, nor is a warning appropriate: if you use DESTDIR during make install you're explictly asking for an installation into a temporary directory which will later on be relocated into the real --prefix (e.g. by your binary packaging mechanism of choice).
The installation will not work until you finish the install and relocate it into the real prefix, that's entirely expected behaviour.
Thanks, Joe. That makes sense.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
