Re: Possible mod_ssl's backports to 2.2.x? (was: Looking ahead to 2.4.13 / 2.2.30)

2015-05-07 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: *) mod_ssl: Improve handling of ephemeral DH and ECDH keys by allowing custom parameters to be configured via SSLCertificateFile, and by adding standardized DH parameters for 1024/2048/3072/4096 bits.

Re: Possible mod_ssl's backports to 2.2.x? (was: Looking ahead to 2.4.13 / 2.2.30)

2015-05-05 Thread Yann Ylavic
Please note that the primes constants in modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c are from openssl/crypto/bn/bn_const.c. FWIW, attached is a (stripped) diff between the two files that shows constants are the same... On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Possible backport

Re: Possible mod_ssl's backports to 2.2.x? (was: Looking ahead to 2.4.13 / 2.2.30)

2015-05-05 Thread Yann Ylavic
Possible backport patch attached. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to propose those 2.4.x CHANGES (r1542327+r1569005+r1542327) for backport to 2.2.x (in reverse order): *) mod_ssl: Fix tmp DH parameter leak, adjust selection to prefer

Re: Possible mod_ssl's backports to 2.2.x? (was: Looking ahead to 2.4.13 / 2.2.30)

2015-05-05 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: I haven't used apache 2.2, but isn't OCSP stapling support still missing there? I think if you're already working on backporting important TLS features that should certainly go with them. My own line for 2.2 would be drawn

Re: Possible mod_ssl's backports to 2.2.x? (was: Looking ahead to 2.4.13 / 2.2.30)

2015-05-05 Thread Hanno Böck
I haven't used apache 2.2, but isn't OCSP stapling support still missing there? I think if you're already working on backporting important TLS features that should certainly go with them. -- Hanno Böck http://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: ha...@hboeck.de GPG: BBB51E42 pgpNXAgtjh1Er.pgp