On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
The subject of not having an official binary package was brought up.
We couldn't think of a reason why not except no body wants or has the
time to do it.
That's not it.
The problem is MS's
Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-11-3 16:26
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
The subject of not having an official binary package was brought up.
We couldn't think of a reason why not except no body wants or has the
time to do
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Bing Swen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-11-3 16:26
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
The subject of not having an official binary package was brought up.
We couldn't
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
The subject of not having an official binary package was brought up.
We couldn't think of a reason why not except no body wants or has the
time to do it.
That's not it.
The problem is MS's creation. We can either ship an 'official' msvcrt.dll
based, DDK-built flavor,
